Annals
of the M.B.C. - vol. 1° - n° 2 - September 1988
PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS ON THE USE OF AN AIRBED (CLINITRON
MK 11) IN A THERAPY CENTRE FOR SEVERE BURN PATIENTS
Maviglio R, De Donno G., Mavilio D.
Usl BR 4, Ospedale Regionale, A. Di
Surnma
Divisione di Chirurgia Plastica e Centro Ustioni, Brindisi, Italia
SUMMARY. The
authors describe their experience using the CLINITRON airbed at the Bums Centre in
Brindisi.
The bed has been in use only for a few months and the number of patients treated in it not
very high. However, despite the limits of this experience, the CLINITRON has proved to be
very useful particularly with regard to the patient's comfort, the length of
hospitalization and nursing.
Introduction
It
is well known how difficult it is to treat patients with burns in the posterior surfaces
of the body and how unsatisfactory alternatives to standard beds are in such
circumstances.
We believe that the air fluidized bad (Clinitron MK 11) is a satisfactory solution to the
problem, and that it is useful not only for bum patients but also for long-term patients
(2) (3) (9) and those from whom it is necessary to remove dermis in the dorsal regions.
According to Artz (1), who first used the Clinitron system as a support in the treatment
of bums, this type of bed must be considered one of the most important innovations in this
field.
Burn patients also need to be cared for in a particular microclimate and many authors have
shown the advisability of keeping the patient in a warm dry atmosphere (5) (15) (17).
The air fluidized bed (CLINITRON) uses the principle of "flotation" on porcelain
beads, obtained by means of a weak airflow pumped by a compressor through a filter.
This system was first described by Hargest and Artz of South Carolina University in 1968
(4). It allows the patient to "float" on a substrate of siliconated porcelain
beads of mean diameter 90 l.L; a special filter sheet with a mesh lower than 37 I.L prevents escape of the beads but
allows the passage of warm dry air, also separating the patient from the moving beads.
Thus when the bed is functioning the patient is, as it were, immersed in a fluid to a
depth of about 10 cm, where it has been calculated that pressure on the body surface is
less than about 10 min Hg of capillary pressure (3). This allows a more equal distribution
of pressure on the usual support areas (head, back, sacral area and heels) as well as
better oxygenation of local tissue, as demonstrated by measuring PO 2 in the sacral region with the bed
not operating (PO 2 : 15-20 min Hg) and operating (PO 2 : 70-75 mm Hg).
The velocity and temperature of the airflow surrounding the patient can be varied
according to the needs and the comfort of the individual; maceration of the tissues is
prevented as bum areas are kept dry and a satisfactory state of comfort is maintained.
The bed is fitted with a system for weighing the patient and a winch mechanism for lifting
and moving the patient atraumatically in order to allow medication.
Case Histories
The
air fluidized bed CLINITRON MK 11 has been in use in our Bums Centre for about a year.
Some technical problems arose when it was first installed in our already functioning
Centre because of the hygroscopic nature of the beads and it was necessary to adapt the
climatization system in the room in order to prevent their excessive aggregation.
We then proceeded to select patients to be placed on the bed, following certain
guidelines. Obviously, considering the highly sophisticated nature of the apparatus and
its high running costs, the bed cannot be systematically used for any type of burn.
First of all we considered the depth of the bums and their site, opting for second degree
intermediate and intermediate deep bums and third degree bums involving the dorsal
regions.
We then considered age; when we were obliged to make a choice we opted for babies and
young children, as the movement that is set up on the Clinitron bed "rocks" the
child, allowing him to relax calmly and reducing agitation.
No patient weighing over 100 kg was treated on the Clinitron bed. Altogether we treated 15
patients aged between 3 and 50 yearsl with burned body surface area between 15 and 45%,
mostly involving the back, buttocks and posterior surface of the legs.
The patient was placed on the Clinitron immediately upon admission to the Centre,
compatibly with the logistic situation, and kept there until full recovery or, when
surgery was necessary, until skin grafts had taken.
Adult bum patients were placed directly on the bed with just a normal sheet, while
children were placed on the Clinitron with a Metalline sheet.
Whenever possible we used open treatment, but in third degree bums we preferred the closed
method in order to ensure, with the aid of salicylate vaseline, more rapid debriding of
necrotic areas. Five patients were not placed immediately on the Clinitron because on
their admission the bed was already occupied.
Surgery was necessary for 6 patients, performed on average on the 18th day.
The period of treatment varied between 2 and 3 weeks.
Particular attention was paid to the patient's water and sodium balance. There is ample
evidence in the literature that a patient placed on the Clinitron has notable water loss
(about 1.5 1) without any simultaneous loss of sodium, frequently leading to
hypernatremia; this would appear to be caused by an increased loss of water without sodium
from the bum areas, due to the patient's being surrounded by warm dry air (7) (8) (11)
(15) (16) (18).
Discussion and
conclusions
On the basis of our use of the airbed,
though limited in time, we can state the following: there is certainly a clear reduction
in pain so that the patient is able to rest more and better; locally we noticed a more
rapid elimination of the necrotic areas, spontaneous healing in many areas of second
degree intermediate and intermediate -deep bums to a greater extent and more rapidly than
seen in patients placed on conventional beds, quicker and more complete attachment of the
grafts, more rapid healing of donor areas.
With regard to infection, we noticed - in line with other authors (6) (13) (14) - a sharp
reduction particularly in gram-negative sepses also when we used occlusive bandaging,
probably because the continuous ventilation with warm dry air creates a growth medium that
is unsuitable for such germs; this finding was even more evident when the patient was
moved from a standard bed to the Clinitron.
Regarding body temperature, we did not notice any great variations. However, we were
better able to control hyperthermia thanks to the possibility of thermoregulation of the
support surfaces of the patient's body.
Last but not least, the Clinitron bed guarantees the bum patient better and less traumatic
nursing as only one nurse is necessary to carry out all the manoeuvres necessary for the
patient.
RÉSUMÉ.
Les auteurs exposent leur experience sur l'utilisation d'un lit à air
"Clinitron" à l'Hopital des Grands Brûlés de Brindisi. L'expérience en
question, bien que limitée par le petit nombre de cas traités (en effet le lit n'a été
attribué qu'il y a quelques mois) se révèle positive surtout en ce qui concerne le
"confort" des patients, le temps du séjour à l'hôpital et le travail du
personnel sanitaire.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Ariz C.P.: Bums Updated. J.
Trauma 16:3-15, 1976.
- Coker K.E.: The intermittent Air Fluidized Bed and the
neurologically impaired patient.
J. of Neurosurg. Nursing 11: 31-33, 1979.
- Hafstra P.C.: The Air Fluidized Bed utilized for spinal
cord injuries patients.
In: Ariz C.P. and Hargest T.S (Ed.) Air Fluidized Bed Clinical and Research Symposium.
- Hargest T.S., Ariz C.P.: The Air Fluidized Bed: a new
conception in patient care.
Assn. Op. Room Nurses J. 10:50-53, 1969.
- Hemdon D.: Mediators of metabolism. Proceedings of 11
Conference on Supportive Therapy in Bum Care.
J. Trauma 21 (N. 8 Suppl.) :701-704, 1981.
- Lioret N., Lesage D., Grange R. et al.: Seven years'
experience in use of fluidized bed for treatment of bum patients.
Acts of the 6th ISBI Congress.
- Michaels J., Sorensen B.: Water and Sodium balance: the
effect 14 of air-fluidized bed on burned patients.
Burn 9:305-311, 1983.
- Newsome T.N., Johns L.A., Pruitt B.A.: Use of an
Air-Fluidized bed in the care of patients with extensive bums.
Am. J. Surg. 124:52-55. 1972.
- Parish L.C., Witkowski J.A.: CLINITRON therapy and
decubiins ulcer: preliminary dermatologic studies
Int. J. Dermatol 19:517-518, 1980.
- Pearce J.A.: Skin pressure distributions on three methods
of patient support.
In: Ariz C.P., Hargest T.S. (Ed.) Air Fluidized Bed Clinical and Research Symposium 1:
85-89, 1971.
- Rath T., Berger A.: Treatment of severe bum cases in the
air-fluidized bed.
Burn 9:115-117, 1983
- Scheulen J.J., Munster A.M.: CLINITRON air-fluidized
support: an adjunct to bum care.
J. of Burn Care Rehab. 4:271-275, 1983.
- Sharbaugh R.J., Hargest T.S.: Bactericidal effect of the
AirFluidized Bed.
Am. Surg. 37:583-586, 1971.
- Sharbaugh R.J., Hargest T.S., Wright F.A.: Further studies
on the bactericidal effect of the Air-Fluidized Bed.
Am. Surg. 39:253-256, 1983.
- Thomson C.W., Ryan D.W., Dunkin L.J, et at.: Fluidized bead
bed in an intensive therapy unit.
Lancet 15 i:568-570, 1980.
- Wassermann D., Raffard J.P., Schlotteker M. ed al.:
Problèmes hydroélectrolytiques près l'utilisation du lit fluidizé chez le grand
brûlé à la periode initiale.
Anesth. Annal. Réan. 34:1345-1356, 1977.
- Wilmore D.W., Mason A.D., Johnson D.W. ed al.: Effect of
ambient temperature on heat production and heat loss in burn patients.
J. Appl. Physiol. 38:593-596, 1975.
- Yargreugh D.R.: The use of the air-fluidized bed in the
manage ment of burned patients.
In: Artz C.P., Hargest T.S. (Ed.) Air-Fluidized Bed Clinical and Research Symposium.
1:55-60, 1971.
|