Annals of
Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XII - n° 2 - June 1999
MODULATION BY
ASPIRIN OF PLATELET FUNCTION IN BURN PATIENTS: CLINICAL AND LABORATORY ASSESSMENT
Kamel A.H.,* Ahmed Y.A.A.,** Thabet N.M.,*** EI-Haish M.K.**
* Department Plastic, Reconstruction and Burns Unit,
Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt ** Haematology Unit, General Medicine Department
*** Clinical Pathology Department
SUMMARY. A study was carried out on twenty burn
patients in order to study the effect of aspirin on burn wound healing and platelet
function. The patients were equally divided into two groups, a classic group and a group
that received aspirin. The use of aspirin in an antithrombotic dose (150 mg/day) starting
from the first day post-burn was found to enhance burn wound healing, without any
complications.
Introduction
Jackson described three concentric zones of thermal injury in the
burn wound, thus providing a practical basis for discussing local burn injury. The central
area is termed the zone of coagulation. Extending concentrically from the central zone
lies the labile area of injured cells which, under the most ideal circumstances, have the
potential ability to survive. The progressive injury that results from dermal ischaernia
occurs in this zone, designated by Jackson the zone of stasis. Before the mechanism of
progressive dennal ischaemia was understood, cells in this zone routinely progressed to
necrosis within 24-48 h post-burn. Lying further peripherally is the zone of hyperaernia,
where injury is minimal. A clear relationship between the state of intravascular
thrombosis and the degree of burn can be shown by means of cinephotomicrography, for the
visualization and photography of the microcirculation of the burn wound. The problems of
evaluating the source of coagulation defects in burn patients are numerous. The idea that
the progressive changes in the burn wound might be related to inflammation led
investigators to study the possible role of inflammatory mediators, especially
prostaglandins. Thromboxane is a potent platelet aggregator and vasoconstrictor, which was
isolated from burn blister fluid. When the thromboxane response is prevented
pharmacologically, platelet adherence is reduced and vasoconstriction is prevented.
Burn patients present significant thromboeytopenia, attributed to the utilization of
platelets in the burn area, and toxic depression of the blood-forming organs in response
to products arising from tissue destruction and bacterial infection. Thermal injury is
known to result in decreased survival and circulatory half-life of the platelets,
fibrinogen, and procoagulant factors V and IX, while activated platelets can be detected
in the circulation.
The level of platelets is greater in burn patients than in non-burn patients in the
pre-surgical period. The increased number of platelets results from stimulation of acute
phase reaction protein synthesis by the inflammatory reaction of the burn wound and the
secondary messengers, such as cytokines and tymphokines, originating from the burn wound.
Aspirin
Aspirin is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory salicylate. It
irreversibly inhibits the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase, which in platelets is responsible for
the conversion of arachidonic acid to thromboxane A2- In vascular wall cells, it is
responsible for the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin 12 (PGI 2). Thromboxane A2 induces platelet aggregation and
vasoconstriction, while PGI2 inhibits platelet
recruitment and induces vasodilatation.
Aspirin is absorbed rapidly in the stomach and upper intestine, with peak plasma levels
occurring after 14 to 20 min and inhibition of platelet function within I h. Although
aspirin in plasma has a half-life of 15 to 20 min the platelet inhibitory effect lasts for
the platelet's life-span (9 to 10 days) because of the irreversible acetylation of
platelet cyclo-oxygenase. Graham et al. postulated that since the side-effects of aspirin
are dose-dependent and many of the clinical conditions in which aspirin is effective
require long-term use ofthe drug, the lowest effective dose should be administered,
Aspirin administered in doses of approximately 100 mg/day inhibits both platelet
thromboxane A2 synthesis and vascular PGI2 synthesis. According to Herd et al. the
recommended antithrombotic dose of aspirin is 150 mg per day. The possible side-effects of
aspirin include benign gastric (but not duodenal) ulcer, an increase in the incidence of
stomach pain, heart burn, nausea, constipation, and occult gastrointestinal blood loss.
All these conditions may occur at a dose of 900 mg per day or more.
Patients and methods
This study was carried out at the Burn Unit of Assiut University
Hospital (Egypt) in the period December 1996February 1998. The study regarded twenty
patients suffering from recent burns of varying degree covering 15 to 40% TBSA (mean, 27.0
17.3%). The ages ranged from 15 to 45 yr (mean, 26.5 10.5 yr). The patients had no
pre-existing medical pathology. The period of study lasted 17 days. Laboratory results
were compared with those of a control group comprising 16 healthy subjects. The data were
analysed by Student's t-test and the chisquare lest.
The patients were divided into two groups of ten patients each. Patients in the first
group (defined as the classic group) received only classical burn management, while those
in the second group (defined as the aspirin group) received aspirin in an antithrombotic
dose of 150 mg per day in addition to classic burn management. Patient data are presented
in Table I.
|
Classic
group |
Aspirin
group |
Number |
10 |
10 |
Sex |
|
|
Male |
1 |
3 |
Female |
9 |
7 |
Age (yr) (mean ± S13) |
24.4 ± 9 |
27A ± 12 |
Total burn percentage |
16-40
(22.2 ± 11) |
15-40 (25
± 10) |
|
Table I - Patients' demographic data |
Assessment was by
clinical observation and laboratory tests. The geographical distribution of the wound was
observed every other day. Changes in burn depth were determined clinically under the
supervision of two physicians with at least ten years experience in burn management. A
drug monitoring sheet was used to study any complications related to the medication used.
With regard to laboratory studies, bedside samples of blood were taken from peripheral
veins in each patient with two days' time interval between samples. The first sample was
obtained within 24 h of the burn and the last on day 17 post-burn. The blood samples were
used for the following investigations, which were also effected in the controls: 1.
complete blood picture, including haemoglobin, haematocrit, and platelet count; 2.
screening tests for coagulation, e.g. prothrombin time and activated partial
thromboplastin time; 3. screening tests for fibrinolysis, e.g. fibrinogen and fibrinogen
degradation products; 4. specific tests for platelets, i.e. platelet aggregation, platelet
size distribution, and B-thromboglobulin.
Results
The patients' demographic data are presented in Table I,
which shows that as regards age, sex, and percentage of burn the difference between the
classic and the aspirin groups was insignificant. Table II indicates that the
difference between the groups as regards the percentage of different degrees of burn on
admission was also insignificant.
|
Classic
group |
Aspirin group |
First degree |
2.4 ± 1.1 |
2.1 + 3.0 |
Superficial second degree |
9.9 ± 4.9 |
7.1 ± 7.2 |
Deep second degree |
10.2 ± 6.0 |
11.9 ± 10.0 |
Third degree |
5.6 ± 4.7 |
6.3 ± 4.4 |
Percentage of healing |
11.6 ± 5.1 |
17.2 ± 3.2* |
* Versus classic group p <
0.05 |
|
Table II - Percentage of burn degree and healing
(mean ± SID) in classic and aspirin groups |
However, the percentage of healing was
significantly better in the aspirin group than in the classic group. This difference was
manifest from day 13 postburn until the end of the study (Table III).
Days |
5 |
7 |
9 |
11 |
13 |
15 |
17 |
Classic |
1.8 ± 2.0 |
3,8 ± 3.0 |
7.3 ± 4.0 |
7.7 ± 3.7 |
8.2 ± 5.0 |
9.4 ± 5.0 |
11.5 ± 5.0 |
Asphin |
5.8 ± 4.0 |
5.1 ± 6.0 |
6,5 ± 6.0 |
7.1 ± 6.0 |
12.0 ± 5.0 |
14.2 ± 5.0* |
17.2 ± 3.0* |
* Versus classic group (p
< 0.05) |
|
Table III - Comparison of percentage of burn wound
healing (mean + SD) in the two groups of patients during the period of study |
The aspirin and the
classic group presented insignificant differences as regards the values of the haemoglobin
level and haernatocrit.With regard to platelet count (Table IV), the classic and
the aspirin group showed a significant increase in comparison with control starting from
day 7 post-burn until the end of the study, while aspirin had no effect on platelet count
in comparison with the classic group.
Days |
1 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
11 |
13 |
15 |
17 |
Classic
group |
302 ± 67 |
232 ± 92 |
238 ± 90 |
373
± 97* |
445
± 99** |
460
± 95** |
449
± 97** |
312
± 99** |
509
± 98* |
Aspirin
group |
316 ± 43 |
232 ± 39 |
298 ± 98 |
378
± 94* |
474
± 91** |
483
± 99** |
483
± 96** |
529
± 93** |
487
± 93* |
Control level = 301.4 ± 63.0 (16 persons)
Versus control *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Versus classic group # p < 0.05,
## p < 0.01 |
|
Table IV - Platelet count (mean ± SD) in classic
and aspirin group platelet count (x 10'/I) |
The study of platelet size distribution (Table V) produced
the following findings:
the percentage of smallsized platelets ("indicators of bone
marrow activity") was significantly increased in the classic and aspirin groups
almost throughout the study in comparison with control, with aspirin having no effect on
the percentage of smallsized platelets;
the percentage of huge-sized platelets ("indicators of platelet
consumption") was lower in theaspirin than in the classic group in the first five
days postburn days,with a statistically significant difference only on days 1, 9, and 17.
|
Percentage
small-sized platelets |
Percentage
huge-sized platelets |
Days |
Classic
group |
Aspirin group |
Classic
group |
Aspirin
group |
1 |
26.3 ± 11* |
31.9 ± 11.0 |
8.2 ± 10.0* |
4.3 ± 1.3# |
3 |
24.8 ± 10.0 |
22.3 ± 5.0 |
5.4 ± 5.0 |
4.7 ± 1.0 |
5 |
31.0 ± 7.2* |
33.7 ± 8.0* |
6.7 ± 2.0 |
4.2 ± 3.0 |
7 |
30.0 ± 8.7* |
34.6 ± 20.0 |
4.1 ± 4.0* |
5.7 ± 5.0* |
9 |
31.6 ± 11.0* |
32.2 ± 6.0 |
4.0 ± 3.0 |
2.4 ± 1.0# |
11 |
32.2 ± 8.0* |
32.2 ± 3.7 |
3.1 ± 2.0* |
5.6 ± 5.0 |
13 |
40.0 ± 15.0** |
35.7 ± 9.0 |
3.7 ± 3.0* |
3.2 ± 2.4 |
15 |
36.0 ± 6.0** |
35.4 ± 7.0 |
2.4 ± 1.7* |
1.6 ± 0.9 |
17 |
33.0 ± 10.0* |
36.0 ± 7.0 |
6.1 ± 8.0 |
2.9 ± 2.2# |
|
Control level = 25.2 ± 9.4
(16 persons)
Versus control * p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Versus classic # p < 0.05 |
Control level 6.0 ± 2.9 (16
persons)
Versus control * p < 0.05 |
|
Table
V - Percentage of small-sized and huge-sized platelets (mean ± SD) in different
groups |
As regard platelet
aggregation (Table VI) with ADP concentration of 1,3,5 M/L (ohm/5 min), this showed
that the figures of the aspirin group were lower than those of the classic group
throughout the study. This difference was statistically significant in the first 5 days
post-burn, especially as regards the IUM/L concentration. Drug monitoring sheet: no
aspirin-related complication was recorded at a dose of 150 ing/day.
|
IUM/L |
3 UMIL |
SUM/L |
|
Classic |
Aspitin |
Classic |
Aspifin |
Classic |
Aspirin |
1 |
1.3 ± 2,0 |
0.0 ± 0.0* |
5.3 ± 4.0 |
1.0 ± 0.68 |
8.9 ± 5.0 |
5.0 ± 4.8* |
3 |
1.7 ± 5.0 |
0.0 ± 0.0* |
2.4 ± 5.0 |
1,0 ± 2.0 |
4.5 ± 4.0 |
2.4 ± 3.6 |
5 |
1.0 ± 2.0 |
0.3 ± 1.0 |
2.2 ± 2.0 |
1.8 ± 6.0 |
6.0 ± 7.3 |
5.4 ± 10.0 |
7 |
2,6 ± 5.0 |
2.3 ± 4.0 |
1.7 ± 2.0 |
2.0 ± 3.0 |
6.9 ± 4.5 |
7.6 ± 9.0 |
9 |
6.0 ± 8.0 |
2,4 ± 3.0** |
6.0 ± 7.0 |
2.8 ± 2.7** |
7.5 ± 7.0 |
7.1 ± 2.9 |
11 |
0.9 ± 1.0 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
3.8 ± 5.0 |
2,8 ± 3.0 |
10.6 ± 7.0 |
11.0 ± 10,5 |
13 |
2.7 ± 3.0 |
0.6 ± 1.0* |
7.3 ± 5.5 |
2,3 ± 3.00** |
13.2 ± 9.0 |
9.0 ± 9.4 |
15 |
1.4 ± 3.0 |
1.4 ± 4.0 |
5.0 ± 3.3 |
5,0 ± 5.0 |
5.0 ± 3.3 |
7.5 ± 5.0 |
17 |
0.8 ± 2.0 |
0.6 ± 2.0 |
1.4 ± 1.0 |
1,3 ± 6.5 |
8.2 ± 7.0 |
9.0 ± 8,0 |
|
Control
level 8.8 ± 5.0
Aspirin versus classic
*
p < 0.05
** p
< 0,01 |
Control
level 9,9 ± 5,0
Aspirin versus classic
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01 |
Control level
12.8 ± 3.8
Aspirin versus classic
* p < 0.05 |
|
Table VI -
Platelet aggregation (mean ± SD) with ADP concentration of 1,3,5 MIL in
different groups |
Discussion
This study was carried out to assess
the effect of an antithrombotic dose of aspirin on burn wound healing and platelet
function. The latter may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of microthrombosis in
the burn wound site, resulting in deepening of the burn wound. It was observed in our
study that burn wound healing in the aspirin group was significantly better than to that
in the classic group, a finding that was consistent with the study published by Delbaccaro
et al., who used specific thromboxane synthetase inhibitor other than aspirin in an
attempt to prevent progressive dermal ischaernia and necrosis.
Research on infection, dehydration, and anaemia as a major factor inhibiting the healing
process was performed, showing a non-significant difference between the classic and the
aspirin groups.
In our study the platelet count in the first week was low in both groups (classic and
aspirin) and significantly increased in the second week. These findings are consistent
with those published in the literature. The low platelet count in the first week is most
probably due to peripheral destruction or utilization of platelets in the burn area, as
reported by Davis et al., and not to bone marrow depression in response to products
arising from tissue destruction, as reported by Geogieva. Our finding was that in the same
period (first week) there was a significant increase in the percentage of small-sized
platelets, which is considered to be an indicator of increased bone activity.
The compensatory hyperactivity of platelets in the aspirin group was significantly less
than in the classic group, as indicated by the lower percentage of huge-sized platelets in
the aspirin group. This indirectly means decreased platelet destruction and/or utilization
in the aspirin group. However, this effect did not manifest itself in our study in the
form of a significant increase in the platelet count in the aspirin group. Aspirin may
have had an effect on platelet consumption but it did not prevent platelet destruction and
had no effect on the platelets life span, which has been reported to be shortened in burn
patients.
Aspirin significantly decreased platelet adhesiveness, as indicated by the low figures of
platelet aggregation in different concentrations in the aspirin group compared with the
classic group. We also found that there were factors that increased platelet aggregation
and adhesiveness in burn patients and were not inhibited by aspirin, such as platelet
activating factor, which increased post-burn and was cyclooxygenase independent, and
fibrinogen proteins. We did not study the inhibitory effect of aspirin on the
vasoconstriction induced by thromboxane released from the burn wound. This may have a role
in the improvement of tissue perfusion and the enhancement of burn wound healing in
patients receiving aspirin.
We are in agreement with findings in the literature that the use of aspirin in minimal
doses is not associated with complications, even when administered from day 1 post-burn.
Conclusion
The use of aspirin in an antithrombotic
dose (150 mg/day) starting from the first day post-burn was found to enhance burn wound
healing, without any complications.
Aspirin affects platelet aggregation in burn patients, especially in the first week
post-burn, after which other substances were released from the burn wound or were
secondary to it. These affected platelet function and were not affected by aspirin.
RESUME.
Les Auteurs ont étudié vingt patients brûlés pour analyser les effets de l'aspirine
sur la guérison des brûlures et la fonction des plaquettes. Les patients ont été
divisés en deux groupes, un groupe classique et un groupe traité avec l'aspirine dans la
dose de 150 mg par jour. Ils ont trouvé que l'emploi de la dose antithrombotique de 150
mg par jour d'aspirine, à partir du premier jour après la brûlure, améliorait la
guérison des brûlures, sans provoquer de complications.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Jackson D.M.: The diagnosis of the depth of burning. Br. J.
Surg., 40: 388, 1953.
- Robb H.J.: Dynamic of microcirculation during burn. Arch.
Surg., 94: June 1967.
- Charles F.G., John A.P., John N., Feller L.: Coagulation
defects in burned patients. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, 133: Oct. 1971.
- Angaard E., Arturson G., Jonsson C.E.: Effect of
prostaglandins in lymph from scalded tissue. Acta Physiol. Scand., 80: 46, 1970.
- Heggers J.P. et al.: Evaluation of burn blister fluid.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 65: 798, 1980.
- Raine T.J. et al.: Cooling the burn wound to maintain
microcirculation. J. Trauma, 21:394, 1981.
- Lebeaupin J., Guimbretiere L., Toscer J., Magre J.Y.:
Hemostasis in burn patients. Cah. Anaesthesiol., 13: 327, 1965.
- Davis W.M., Davis A.K., Lee W., Alpen E.: The combined
effects of thermal burns and whole body x-irradiation. Study of blood coagulation. Ann.
Surg., 142: 66, 1955.
- Geogieva S.A.: Blood coagulation in cases of burns. Saratov
Med. Inst., 28: 91, 1950.
- Simon T.L., Cufferi P.W., Harker L.A.: Kinetic
characterization of hemostasis in thermal injury. J. Lab. Clin. Med., 89: 702-11, 1977.
- Nurden A.T., Bihour C., Macchi L.: Platelet activation in
thrombotic disorders. Nouv. Rev. Fr. Hematology, 35: 67-71, 1993.
- Forbes C.D., Madhok R.: "Disorders of
hemostasis", W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 141-202, 1992.
- Majerus P.W.: Arachidonate metabolism in vascular
disorders. J. Clin. Invest., 72: 1521, 1982.
- Moneada S., Vane J.R.: Arachidonic acid metabolism, N.
Engl. J. Med.: 300-1142, 1997.
- Pedersen A.K., Fitzgerald G.A.: Dose-related kinetics of
aspirin presystemic acetylation of platelet cyclo-oxygenase. N. Engl. J. Med.: 311-1206,
1984.
- Roth G.E.: Incorporation of hypoxanthin into adenine and
guanine nucleotide by human platelets. Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 381: 144, 1975.
- Graham S.S., Smith L.: Aspirin and the stomach. Ann. Inter.
Med., 104: 390, 1986.
- Wesksler B.B., Pert S.B.: Differential inhibition by
aspirin of vascular and platelet prostaglandin. N. Engl. J. Med., 308: 800, 1983.
- UK TIA Study Group: The UK TIA aspirin trial interim
result. Br. Med. J., 296: 316, 1987.
- Peto R., Gray R., CaRins R.: Randomized trial of
prophylactic daily aspirin in British male doctors. Br. Med. J., 296: 313, 1987.
- Delbaccaro E.J. et a].: The use of specific thromboxane
inhibitors to preserve the dermal microcirculation after burning. Surg., 87: 137, 1980.
- Joseph R., Welch K.M.: Effect of therapy on platelet
activating factor-induced aggregation in acute stroke. Stroke, 20: 609, 1989.
- Iono, H., Gunji, T., Hasegawa H.: Effect of a
platelet-activating factor antagonist on oedema formation following burns, Burns, 19: 202,
1993.
Zucker-Franklin D.: Platelet morphology
and function. In "Hematology", ed. Williams, Bender, Erslev, Lichtman, 122: 172,
1990.
This paper was received on 12 February 1999. Address correspondence to:
Dr Assem Husein Kamel, M.D.
Plastic, Reconstruction and Burns Unit
Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt. |
|