Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XII - n° 2 - June 1999

MODULATION BY ASPIRIN OF PLATELET FUNCTION IN BURN PATIENTS: CLINICAL AND LABORATORY ASSESSMENT

Kamel A.H.,* Ahmed Y.A.A.,** Thabet N.M.,*** EI-Haish M.K.**

* Department Plastic, Reconstruction and Burns Unit, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt ** Haematology Unit, General Medicine Department *** Clinical Pathology Department

SUMMARY. A study was carried out on twenty burn patients in order to study the effect of aspirin on burn wound healing and platelet function. The patients were equally divided into two groups, a classic group and a group that received aspirin. The use of aspirin in an antithrombotic dose (150 mg/day) starting from the first day post-burn was found to enhance burn wound healing, without any complications.


Introduction

Jackson described three concentric zones of thermal injury in the burn wound, thus providing a practical basis for discussing local burn injury. The central area is termed the zone of coagulation. Extending concentrically from the central zone lies the labile area of injured cells which, under the most ideal circumstances, have the potential ability to survive. The progressive injury that results from dermal ischaernia occurs in this zone, designated by Jackson the zone of stasis. Before the mechanism of progressive dennal ischaemia was understood, cells in this zone routinely progressed to necrosis within 24-48 h post-burn. Lying further peripherally is the zone of hyperaernia, where injury is minimal. A clear relationship between the state of intravascular thrombosis and the degree of burn can be shown by means of cinephotomicrography, for the visualization and photography of the microcirculation of the burn wound. The problems of evaluating the source of coagulation defects in burn patients are numerous. The idea that the progressive changes in the burn wound might be related to inflammation led investigators to study the possible role of inflammatory mediators, especially prostaglandins. Thromboxane is a potent platelet aggregator and vasoconstrictor, which was isolated from burn blister fluid. When the thromboxane response is prevented pharmacologically, platelet adherence is reduced and vasoconstriction is prevented.
Burn patients present significant thromboeytopenia, attributed to the utilization of platelets in the burn area, and toxic depression of the blood-forming organs in response to products arising from tissue destruction and bacterial infection. Thermal injury is known to result in decreased survival and circulatory half-life of the platelets, fibrinogen, and procoagulant factors V and IX, while activated platelets can be detected in the circulation.
The level of platelets is greater in burn patients than in non-burn patients in the pre-surgical period. The increased number of platelets results from stimulation of acute phase reaction protein synthesis by the inflammatory reaction of the burn wound and the secondary messengers, such as cytokines and tymphokines, originating from the burn wound.

Aspirin

Aspirin is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory salicylate. It irreversibly inhibits the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase, which in platelets is responsible for the conversion of arachidonic acid to thromboxane A2- In vascular wall cells, it is responsible for the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin 12 (PGI2). Thromboxane A2 induces platelet aggregation and vasoconstriction, while PGI2 inhibits platelet recruitment and induces vasodilatation.
Aspirin is absorbed rapidly in the stomach and upper intestine, with peak plasma levels occurring after 14 to 20 min and inhibition of platelet function within I h. Although aspirin in plasma has a half-life of 15 to 20 min the platelet inhibitory effect lasts for the platelet's life-span (9 to 10 days) because of the irreversible acetylation of platelet cyclo-oxygenase. Graham et al. postulated that since the side-effects of aspirin are dose-dependent and many of the clinical conditions in which aspirin is effective require long-term use ofthe drug, the lowest effective dose should be administered, Aspirin administered in doses of approximately 100 mg/day inhibits both platelet thromboxane A2 synthesis and vascular PGI2 synthesis. According to Herd et al. the recommended antithrombotic dose of aspirin is 150 mg per day. The possible side-effects of aspirin include benign gastric (but not duodenal) ulcer, an increase in the incidence of stomach pain, heart burn, nausea, constipation, and occult gastrointestinal blood loss.
All these conditions may occur at a dose of 900 mg per day or more.

Patients and methods

This study was carried out at the Burn Unit of Assiut University Hospital (Egypt) in the period December 1996February 1998. The study regarded twenty patients suffering from recent burns of varying degree covering 15 to 40% TBSA (mean, 27.0 17.3%). The ages ranged from 15 to 45 yr (mean, 26.5 10.5 yr). The patients had no pre-existing medical pathology. The period of study lasted 17 days. Laboratory results were compared with those of a control group comprising 16 healthy subjects. The data were analysed by Student's t-test and the chisquare lest.
The patients were divided into two groups of ten patients each. Patients in the first group (defined as the classic group) received only classical burn management, while those in the second group (defined as the aspirin group) received aspirin in an antithrombotic dose of 150 mg per day in addition to classic burn management. Patient data are presented in Table I.

 

Classic group

Aspirin group

Number

10

10

Sex    
        Male

1

3

        Female

9

7

Age (yr) (mean ± S13)

24.4 ± 9

27A ± 12

Total burn percentage

16-40 (22.2 ± 11)

15-40 (25 ± 10)

Table I - Patients' demographic data

Assessment was by clinical observation and laboratory tests. The geographical distribution of the wound was observed every other day. Changes in burn depth were determined clinically under the supervision of two physicians with at least ten years experience in burn management. A drug monitoring sheet was used to study any complications related to the medication used.
With regard to laboratory studies, bedside samples of blood were taken from peripheral veins in each patient with two days' time interval between samples. The first sample was obtained within 24 h of the burn and the last on day 17 post-burn. The blood samples were used for the following investigations, which were also effected in the controls: 1. complete blood picture, including haemoglobin, haematocrit, and platelet count; 2. screening tests for coagulation, e.g. prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time; 3. screening tests for fibrinolysis, e.g. fibrinogen and fibrinogen degradation products; 4. specific tests for platelets, i.e. platelet aggregation, platelet size distribution, and B-thromboglobulin.

Results

The patients' demographic data are presented in Table I, which shows that as regards age, sex, and percentage of burn the difference between the classic and the aspirin groups was insignificant. Table II indicates that the difference between the groups as regards the percentage of different degrees of burn on admission was also insignificant.

  Classic group

Aspirin group

First degree

2.4 ± 1.1

2.1 + 3.0

Superficial second degree

9.9 ± 4.9

7.1 ± 7.2

Deep second degree

10.2 ± 6.0

11.9 ± 10.0

Third degree

5.6 ± 4.7

6.3 ± 4.4

Percentage of healing

11.6 ± 5.1

17.2 ± 3.2*

* Versus classic group p < 0.05

Table II - Percentage of burn degree and healing (mean ± SID) in classic and aspirin groups

However, the percentage of healing was significantly better in the aspirin group than in the classic group. This difference was manifest from day 13 postburn until the end of the study (Table III).

Days

5

7

9

11

13

15

17

Classic

1.8 ± 2.0

3,8 ± 3.0

7.3 ± 4.0

7.7 ± 3.7

8.2 ± 5.0

9.4 ± 5.0

11.5 ± 5.0

Asphin

5.8 ± 4.0

5.1 ± 6.0

6,5 ± 6.0

7.1 ± 6.0

12.0 ± 5.0

14.2 ± 5.0*

17.2 ± 3.0*

* Versus classic group (p < 0.05)

Table III - Comparison of percentage of burn wound healing (mean + SD) in the two groups of patients during the period of study

The aspirin and the classic group presented insignificant differences as regards the values of the haemoglobin level and haernatocrit.With regard to platelet count (Table IV), the classic and the aspirin group showed a significant increase in comparison with control starting from day 7 post-burn until the end of the study, while aspirin had no effect on platelet count in comparison with the classic group.

Days

1 3 5

7

9

11

13

15

17

Classic group 302 ± 67 232 ± 92 238 ± 90

373 ± 97*

445 ± 99**

460 ± 95**

449 ± 97**

312 ± 99**

509 ± 98*

Aspirin group 316 ± 43 232 ± 39 298 ± 98

378 ± 94*

474 ± 91**

483 ± 99**

483 ± 96**

529 ± 93**

487 ± 93*

Control level = 301.4 ± 63.0 (16 persons)        Versus control *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01           Versus classic group # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01

Table IV - Platelet count (mean ± SD) in classic and aspirin group platelet count (x 10'/I)

The study of platelet size distribution (Table V) produced the following findings:

  1. the percentage of smallsized platelets ("indicators of bone marrow activity") was significantly increased in the classic and aspirin groups almost throughout the study in comparison with control, with aspirin having no effect on the percentage of smallsized platelets;

  2. the percentage of huge-sized platelets ("indicators of platelet consumption") was lower in theaspirin than in the classic group in the first five days postburn days,with a statistically significant difference only on days 1, 9, and 17.

 

Percentage small-sized platelets

Percentage huge-sized platelets

Days

Classic group

Aspirin group

Classic group Aspirin group

1

26.3 ± 11* 31.9 ± 11.0 8.2 ± 10.0* 4.3 ± 1.3#

3

24.8 ± 10.0 22.3 ± 5.0 5.4 ± 5.0 4.7 ± 1.0

5

31.0 ± 7.2* 33.7 ± 8.0* 6.7 ± 2.0 4.2 ± 3.0

7

30.0 ± 8.7* 34.6 ± 20.0 4.1 ± 4.0* 5.7 ± 5.0*

9

31.6 ± 11.0* 32.2 ± 6.0 4.0 ± 3.0 2.4 ± 1.0#

11

32.2 ± 8.0* 32.2 ± 3.7 3.1 ± 2.0* 5.6 ± 5.0

13

40.0 ± 15.0** 35.7 ± 9.0 3.7 ± 3.0* 3.2 ± 2.4

15

36.0 ± 6.0** 35.4 ± 7.0 2.4 ± 1.7* 1.6 ± 0.9

17

33.0 ± 10.0* 36.0 ± 7.0 6.1 ± 8.0 2.9 ± 2.2#
  Control level = 25.2 ± 9.4 (16 persons)
Versus control * p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Versus classic # p < 0.05
Control level 6.0 ± 2.9 (16 persons)
Versus control * p < 0.05
Table V - Percentage of small-sized and huge-sized platelets (mean ± SD) in different groups

As regard platelet aggregation (Table VI) with ADP concentration of 1,3,5 M/L (ohm/5 min), this showed that the figures of the aspirin group were lower than those of the classic group throughout the study. This difference was statistically significant in the first 5 days post-burn, especially as regards the IUM/L concentration. Drug monitoring sheet: no aspirin-related complication was recorded at a dose of 150 ing/day.

  IUM/L

3 UMIL

SUM/L
 

Classic

Aspitin

Classic

Aspifin

Classic

Aspirin

1

1.3 ± 2,0

0.0 ± 0.0*

5.3 ± 4.0

1.0 ± 0.68

8.9 ± 5.0

5.0 ± 4.8*

3

1.7 ± 5.0

0.0 ± 0.0*

2.4 ± 5.0

1,0 ± 2.0

4.5 ± 4.0

2.4 ± 3.6

5

1.0 ± 2.0

0.3 ± 1.0

2.2 ± 2.0

1.8 ± 6.0

6.0 ± 7.3

5.4 ± 10.0

7

2,6 ± 5.0

2.3 ± 4.0

1.7 ± 2.0

2.0 ± 3.0

6.9 ± 4.5

7.6 ± 9.0

9

6.0 ± 8.0

2,4 ± 3.0**

6.0 ± 7.0

2.8 ± 2.7**

7.5 ± 7.0

7.1 ± 2.9

11

0.9 ± 1.0

0.0 ± 0.0

3.8 ± 5.0

2,8 ± 3.0

10.6 ± 7.0

11.0 ± 10,5

13

2.7 ± 3.0

0.6 ± 1.0*

7.3 ± 5.5

2,3 ± 3.00** 13.2 ± 9.0

9.0 ± 9.4

15

1.4 ± 3.0

1.4 ± 4.0

5.0 ± 3.3

5,0 ± 5.0

5.0 ± 3.3

7.5 ± 5.0

17

0.8 ± 2.0

0.6 ± 2.0

1.4 ± 1.0

1,3 ± 6.5

8.2 ± 7.0

9.0 ± 8,0

 

Control level 8.8 ± 5.0
Aspirin versus classic
                 * p < 0.05
               ** p < 0,01

Control level 9,9 ± 5,0
Aspirin versus classic
                 * p < 0.05
                ** p < 0.01

Control level 12.8 ± 3.8
Aspirin versus classic
                 * p < 0.05

Table VI - Platelet aggregation (mean ± SD) with ADP concentration of 1,3,5 MIL in different groups

Discussion

This study was carried out to assess the effect of an antithrombotic dose of aspirin on burn wound healing and platelet function. The latter may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of microthrombosis in the burn wound site, resulting in deepening of the burn wound. It was observed in our study that burn wound healing in the aspirin group was significantly better than to that in the classic group, a finding that was consistent with the study published by Delbaccaro et al., who used specific thromboxane synthetase inhibitor other than aspirin in an attempt to prevent progressive dermal ischaernia and necrosis.
Research on infection, dehydration, and anaemia as a major factor inhibiting the healing process was performed, showing a non-significant difference between the classic and the aspirin groups.
In our study the platelet count in the first week was low in both groups (classic and aspirin) and significantly increased in the second week. These findings are consistent with those published in the literature. The low platelet count in the first week is most probably due to peripheral destruction or utilization of platelets in the burn area, as reported by Davis et al., and not to bone marrow depression in response to products arising from tissue destruction, as reported by Geogieva. Our finding was that in the same period (first week) there was a significant increase in the percentage of small-sized platelets, which is considered to be an indicator of increased bone activity.
The compensatory hyperactivity of platelets in the aspirin group was significantly less than in the classic group, as indicated by the lower percentage of huge-sized platelets in the aspirin group. This indirectly means decreased platelet destruction and/or utilization in the aspirin group. However, this effect did not manifest itself in our study in the form of a significant increase in the platelet count in the aspirin group. Aspirin may have had an effect on platelet consumption but it did not prevent platelet destruction and had no effect on the platelets life span, which has been reported to be shortened in burn patients.
Aspirin significantly decreased platelet adhesiveness, as indicated by the low figures of platelet aggregation in different concentrations in the aspirin group compared with the classic group. We also found that there were factors that increased platelet aggregation and adhesiveness in burn patients and were not inhibited by aspirin, such as platelet activating factor, which increased post-burn and was cyclooxygenase independent, and fibrinogen proteins. We did not study the inhibitory effect of aspirin on the vasoconstriction induced by thromboxane released from the burn wound. This may have a role in the improvement of tissue perfusion and the enhancement of burn wound healing in patients receiving aspirin.
We are in agreement with findings in the literature that the use of aspirin in minimal doses is not associated with complications, even when administered from day 1 post-burn.

Conclusion

The use of aspirin in an antithrombotic dose (150 mg/day) starting from the first day post-burn was found to enhance burn wound healing, without any complications.
Aspirin affects platelet aggregation in burn patients, especially in the first week post-burn, after which other substances were released from the burn wound or were secondary to it. These affected platelet function and were not affected by aspirin.

 

RESUME. Les Auteurs ont étudié vingt patients brûlés pour analyser les effets de l'aspirine sur la guérison des brûlures et la fonction des plaquettes. Les patients ont été divisés en deux groupes, un groupe classique et un groupe traité avec l'aspirine dans la dose de 150 mg par jour. Ils ont trouvé que l'emploi de la dose antithrombotique de 150 mg par jour d'aspirine, à partir du premier jour après la brûlure, améliorait la guérison des brûlures, sans provoquer de complications.

 


BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Jackson D.M.: The diagnosis of the depth of burning. Br. J. Surg., 40: 388, 1953.
  2. Robb H.J.: Dynamic of microcirculation during burn. Arch. Surg., 94: June 1967.
  3. Charles F.G., John A.P., John N., Feller L.: Coagulation defects in burned patients. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, 133: Oct. 1971.
  4. Angaard E., Arturson G., Jonsson C.E.: Effect of prostaglandins in lymph from scalded tissue. Acta Physiol. Scand., 80: 46, 1970.
  5. Heggers J.P. et al.: Evaluation of burn blister fluid. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 65: 798, 1980.
  6. Raine T.J. et al.: Cooling the burn wound to maintain microcirculation. J. Trauma, 21:394, 1981.
  7. Lebeaupin J., Guimbretiere L., Toscer J., Magre J.Y.: Hemostasis in burn patients. Cah. Anaesthesiol., 13: 327, 1965.
  8. Davis W.M., Davis A.K., Lee W., Alpen E.: The combined effects of thermal burns and whole body x-irradiation. Study of blood coagulation. Ann. Surg., 142: 66, 1955.
  9. Geogieva S.A.: Blood coagulation in cases of burns. Saratov Med. Inst., 28: 91, 1950.
  10. Simon T.L., Cufferi P.W., Harker L.A.: Kinetic characterization of hemostasis in thermal injury. J. Lab. Clin. Med., 89: 702-11, 1977.
  11. Nurden A.T., Bihour C., Macchi L.: Platelet activation in thrombotic disorders. Nouv. Rev. Fr. Hematology, 35: 67-71, 1993.
  12. Forbes C.D., Madhok R.: "Disorders of hemostasis", W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 141-202, 1992.
  13. Majerus P.W.: Arachidonate metabolism in vascular disorders. J. Clin. Invest., 72: 1521, 1982.
  14. Moneada S., Vane J.R.: Arachidonic acid metabolism, N. Engl. J. Med.: 300-1142, 1997.
  15. Pedersen A.K., Fitzgerald G.A.: Dose-related kinetics of aspirin presystemic acetylation of platelet cyclo-oxygenase. N. Engl. J. Med.: 311-1206, 1984.
  16. Roth G.E.: Incorporation of hypoxanthin into adenine and guanine nucleotide by human platelets. Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 381: 144, 1975.
  17. Graham S.S., Smith L.: Aspirin and the stomach. Ann. Inter. Med., 104: 390, 1986.
  18. Wesksler B.B., Pert S.B.: Differential inhibition by aspirin of vascular and platelet prostaglandin. N. Engl. J. Med., 308: 800, 1983.
  19. UK TIA Study Group: The UK TIA aspirin trial interim result. Br. Med. J., 296: 316, 1987.
  20. Peto R., Gray R., CaRins R.: Randomized trial of prophylactic daily aspirin in British male doctors. Br. Med. J., 296: 313, 1987.
  21. Delbaccaro E.J. et a].: The use of specific thromboxane inhibitors to preserve the dermal microcirculation after burning. Surg., 87: 137, 1980.
  22. Joseph R., Welch K.M.: Effect of therapy on platelet activating factor-induced aggregation in acute stroke. Stroke, 20: 609, 1989.
  23. Iono, H., Gunji, T., Hasegawa H.: Effect of a platelet-activating factor antagonist on oedema formation following burns, Burns, 19: 202, 1993.
  24. Zucker-Franklin D.: Platelet morphology and function. In "Hematology", ed. Williams, Bender, Erslev, Lichtman, 122: 172, 1990.

This paper was received on 12 February 1999.

Address correspondence to:
Dr Assem Husein Kamel, M.D.
Plastic, Reconstruction and Burns Unit
Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.




 

Contact Us
mbcpa@medbc.com