Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XVIII - n. 1 - March 2005 ROLE OF THE ANTIOXIDANT EFFECT OF VITAMIN E WITH VITAMIN C AND TOPICAL POVIDONE-IODINE OINTMENT IN THE TREATMENT OF BURNS
Al-Kaisy A.A.1, Salih Sahib A.21 Department of Surgery, Burn Unit, Baquba General Hospital, Diyala, Iraq
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The skin separates us from our environment, provides the bulk of cooling for heat stress, regulates the egress of body fluids, and prevents outside agents and bacteria from entering the body. When the skin is exposed to excessive heat, such as from fire, electricity, or corrosive chemicals, the resulting tissue damage is known as a burn, and we lose some or all of the skin’s protective to a degree that depends on the extent of the burn.3
Burn injuries can be classified either on the basis of the severity of tissue damage or on the basis of the extent or depth of the injury. Severity is expressed as first-, second- and third-degree burns, extent is expressed as a percentage of the total surface area, and depth is classified as partial or full thickness,4 as follows:
In children, the head is more than 9%, and a good way of estimating the burn area is to say that the child’s palm is 1% of the surface area.
Appropriate treatment for burns depends on the extent of tissue damage, the cause of the burn, and whether or not infection is present. All burns (with the exception of mild, first-degree burns) require immediate medical attention because of the risk of infection, dehydration, and other potentially serious complications.
Treatment objectives are the prevention and treatment of shock, control of bacterial proliferation, and conversion of an open wound to a closed one. Other important considerations are the maintenance and preservation of body function and appearance, healing within a minimum period, and the patient’s mental and emotional stability.
Treatment starts with intravenous (IV) fluid and the maintenance of the airways in unconscious patients. The volume of IV fluid given is calculated by the following formula:
This volume is given at different rates: in the first 8 h, half of the total; in the next 16 h, half the remainder; and in next 24 h, the remainder.
Other medication includes topical14 and systemic antibiotics, analgesia,15 and routine medication such as tetanus toxoid and cimetidine.
Oxidative stress is caused by the presence of free radicals or radical-generating agents in concentrations that overwhelm natural radical-blocking or -scavenging mechanisms.
A skin burn is a common traumatic injury that results in both local tissue damage and a systemic mediator-induced response; there is evidence of both local and systemic oxidant changes manifested by increased oxygen free radical activity18 and lipid peroxidation in animal burn models and also in burned humans.19 Results obtained by Huo et al. showed that both oxygen free radicals and lipid peroxidation play a major role in the injuries caused by skin burns. In addition, it has been shown that burn injury causes a remarkable decrease in superoxide dismutase and total antioxidant status21 and a reduction in antioxidant scavenging capacity when compared with control.22 Nagane et al. suggested that therapeutic use of antioxidants could be beneficial in the clinical management of burn patients.
It has been shown that after burn trauma, tissue adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels gradually fall, and increased adenosine monophosphate (AMP) is converted to hypo-xanthine, providing a substrate for xanthine oxidase. These complicated reactions produce hydrogen peroxide and superoxide, clearly recognized free radicals.24 In addition to xanthine oxidase related free radical generation in burn trauma, adherent-activated neutrophils produce additional free radicals.
Thirty-eight burn patients (18 males and 20 females) of varying age from 1 to 60 yr (mean ± SD, 21.26 ± 16.7) (Fig. 2) and varying burn percentage (Fig. 3) (10-80% estimated according to the Rule of Nines) were admitted to the burn unit in the Department of Surgery in Baquba General Hospital, Diyala, Iraq, over a period of 6 months.
The causes of the patients’ burns (Fig. 4) were direct flame, boiling water, chemical burns, and accidental explosion (this study was conducted in time of war - March 2003).
The patients’ past medical history was negative except for one patient who had diabetes mellitus and another with asthma and hypertension; the social history revealed nothing significant except for one patient only who was a smoker.
The drug treatment given to the patients in the burn unit included intravenous fluid such as Ringer’s solution and glucose water given according to the Parkland method;13 the patients also received systemic antibiotics according to the classical method approved by hospital policy. The antibiotics included ampicillin, gentamicin, ampiclox, cephalosporin, refampicin, cephalothin, and cefotaxime. Local antibiotic ointments were also given to the patients according to availability in the hospital, such as Flamazine, Tetracyclin, and Fucidin ointment. Other drugs given were analgesics like pethidine, morphine, and tramadol, antipyretics like paracetamol, and others like diazepam and Tagamet, according to our hospital drug policy.
The patients were divided into three groups:
In addition, 12 healthy subjects (5 males and 7 females), with the same age range as that of patients, were selected to serve as control for comparison.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blood samples were collected from all subjects by venipuncture. Ten millilitres were taken on admission (zero time) to the burns unit and then every two days of treatment and on discharge day to check changes in the parameters studied. All blood samples were collected in a heparinized plain tube. Erythrocytes were separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min at 4 C; the plasma obtained was used for biochemical analysis, which included:
|
|
|
Treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment showed a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the MDA level after two days (38%) and on discharge day (71%), as well as a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the GSH level after two days (50%) and on discharge day (80%), compared to pre-treatment values (Table II). These data clearly prove the possible antioxidant effect of povidone-iodine ointment when used topically in burn patients.
Treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment together with oral vitamin E and vitamin C significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the MDA level after two and four days (57% and 74% respectively), while the effects on plasma GSH levels were significantly increased (p < 0.05) after four days and on discharge day (96% and 142% respectively), compared to pre-treatment values (Table II).
|
Group A: burn patients treated according to hospital policy regimens
Group B: burn patients treated with topical povidone-iodine ointment in addition to other prescribed drugs
Group C: burn patients treated with topical povidone-iodine ointment with single oral daily dose of vitamin E 400 mg and vitamin C 500 mg
Results represent percentage of total
Zero time represents time of resuscitation
Table II also shows that treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment alone and treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment together with oral vitamin E and vitamin C had no significant effect on serum levels of thyroid hormones T3 and T4 compared to control and pre-treatment values.
In addition, Table II clearly shows that there were no significant differences between the groups studied as regards the serum values of liver enzyme activities, compared to control. There was no significant difference in serum values of liver enzyme activities between group B, treated with topical povidone-iodine ointment, and group C, treated with topical povidone-iodine ointment together with oral vitamin E and vitamin C, compared to pre-treatment.
The results shown in Table II show that there was a significant elevation in blood urea and serum creatinine levels in all treated groups (A, B, C) at zero time compared to control. In contrast, after initiation of treatment, blood urea and serum creatinine levels decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in all groups after two and four days, returning to normal level at discharge day, compared to pre-treatment.
Table III and Fig. 5 show the incidence and distribution of the invading micro-organisms isolated from the burn patients. The percentage of positive swabs increased from 25% at zero time to 75% after two and four days in group A, while treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment (group B) altered the incidence of wound infection from 23.5% at zero time and two days later to 17.6% after four days and at discharge time.
|
|
Treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment together with oral vitamin E and vitamin C (group C) decreased the incidence of infection in burn patients by 7.7% after two days and by 15.3% after four days and at discharge time when compared with zero time. Table III also shows that 27.1% of swab cultures were bacteriologically positive; the micro-organisms isolated, as shown in Fig. 5, were Staphylococcus aureus (46.%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (38.5%), Klebsiella spp. (10.25%), and Entero-bacter spp. (5.25%).
Table IV shows the reduction in mortality rate in the groups treated. Treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment reduced the mortality rate from 87.5% to 5.88%, and treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment and oral vitamin E with vitamin C reduced the mortality rate from 87.5% to 7.7%, compared to the classically treated group.
Since seven out of the eight patients (87.5%) died during the course of treatment in group A, and one patient was discharged from the burns unit by the patient’s own decision, no healing time was calculated for group A.
Treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment and oral vitamin E with vitamin C significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the healing time by two days (22.7%), compared to group B, which was treated with topical povidone-iodine ointment only.
Table IV does not present any values for group A in relation to cost calculated per course of treatment since the mortality rate in this group was very high, with seven patients out of eight dying and one patient being discharged from the burn unit on the patient’s own decision; in this group cost was calculated on a per day basis.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Group A: burn patients treated according to hospital policy regimens
Group B: burn patients treated with topical povidone-iodine ointment in addition to other prescribed drugs
Group C: burn patients treated with topical povidone-iodine ointment with single oral daily dose of vitamin E 400 mg and vitamin C 500 mg
Results represents percentage of total or mean ± standard deviation
N represents number of subjects
Results with non-identical superscripts were considered significantly different (p < 0.05)
Treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the cost calculated on a per day basis, compared to group A; the reduction was 45.8% (5955 Iraqi dinars [ID]). Treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment and oral vitamin E with vitamin C also significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the cost by 50% (6500 ID) compared to group A, while there was no significant change between groups B and C.
When cost was calculated per course of treatment, treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment and oral vitamin E with vitamin C significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the cost by 37% (23,000 ID), compared to group B.
Despite advances in burn care techniques, there is still a tendency for therapeutic failure in patients who sustain burns in a large percentage of the total body surface area. Changes in medical treatment protocols, seeking new mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of burn trauma, may be helpful in the successful treatment of burn patients.
Thermal injury of the skin is an oxidation injury, associated with biological and metabolic alterations; thermal injury generates free radicals from various cellular populations, and the modulation of free radical activity with scavengers may improve outcome.
As shown in Table II, treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment significantly decreased the end-product of lipid peroxidation (MDA) two days after start of treatment and at discharge, and also significantly increased the level of natural antioxidant (GSH) two days after start of treatment and at discharge, indicating the antioxidant effect of povidone-iodine. This was the first time the antioxidant effect of povidone-iodine was shown when used topically as an ointment for burn patients.
The mechanism by which povidone-iodine exerts its antioxidant effect may be due to its iodine content. It has been shown that in iodide-concentrating cells, such as stomach and thyroid cells as well as epidermis cells, iodide may act as an electron donor in the presence of H2O2 and peroxidase, and the remaining iodine readily iodinates tyrosine.41 Also, Katamine et al.42 have shown that dietary iodides are able to defend brain cells from lipid peroxidation in rats. The antioxidant action of iodide has also been described in isolated rabbit eye.43 Muranov et al.44 have shown the protective role of iodide against cataract development induced by selinite, and he supposed that the anticataract effect of iodide could be based on a direct or indirect antioxidant mechanism.
Schmut et al.45 showed that iodide protected hyaluro-nate, a component of tear fluid and tissues of the anterior part of the eye, against UVB light-induced degradation, and he suggested that the administration of an antioxidant such as iodide to artificial tears might help prevent eye damage provoked by oxidative stress.
Additionally, Winkler et al.46 showed that the administration of NaI led to a significantly increased antioxidant capacity (using what is known as the Total Antioxidant Status determined by a calorimetric method) compared to NaC, while Tatzber et al.47 gave an explanation for the increased total antioxidant status in the presence of iodide, which may be due to an indirect protective effect via enhanced activity of enzymatic antioxidants, thereby reducing endogenous peroxides. These data may provide an explanation for results presented in Table II.
Treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment and oral vitamin E with vitamin C also significantly reduced the MDA level after two and four days and at the same time significantly raised the level of reduced glutathione (GSH) after four days, reaching control levels at discharge, as shown in Table II.
Our results are compatible with those obtained by Fang et al.40 and Matsuda et al.,48 in which the administration of vitamin E, a well-known antioxidant, improved burn outcome and the addition of vitamin C diminished early post-burn lipid peroxidation and cellular injury and dysfunction, by virtue of their ability to scavenge free radicals and inhibit the activation of the nuclear factor kappa B
(NFKB), a mediator responsible for inflammation.
To investigate the changes that may occur in thyroid hormone levels following burns treated topically with povidone-iodine, the serum levels of thyroxin (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) were measured. Table II shows that there were no significant changes in these values in burn patients treated with povidone-iodine, compared to control; also, clinical signs and symptoms considered to be attributable to thyroid dysfunction were not seen in any of the subjects, and no cases of goitre were observed.
Our results are compatible with those obtained by Balogh et al.,50 who found no significant changes in thyroid function compared to control, especially when renal function was unimpaired, since the absorbed iodine responsible for these changes was quickly excreted. In contrast, data reported by Aiba et al.51 showed that long-term use of topical povidone-iodine in burn patients caused iodine toxicosis manifested as hypotension, bradycardia, metabolic acidosis, and renal failure, while in 1983 Preissler52 showed that T4 and T3 concentrations decreased significantly during the first two weeks in extensive burns treated with topical application of povidone-iodine.
Increased liver enzyme levels (SGPT, SGOT, and alkaline phosphatase) are usually regarded as expressions of cellular necrosis, especially in hepatocytes. They reflect cellular damage due to burn which according to many researchers becomes normal before the patients’ discharge.
Temporary nonsignificant elevations in the activity of GPT, GOT, and alkaline phosphatase were observed in all groups (Table II), indicating that treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment alone or in combination with oral vitamin E and vitamin C had no effect on liver enzymes.
The same observation was made when checking blood urea and serum creatinine as a renal function test. The results presented in Table II show that there was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the level of blood urea and serum creatinine at zero time in all groups compared to control; they also show that during the course of treatment in all groups there was a gradual normalization in renal function test data compared to normal control.
These data are consistent with those obtained by others55,56 and give a clear indication of the renal safety of treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment alone or in combination with oral vitamin E and vitamin C in burn patients. Table III shows the reduction in percentage of incidence of infection in groups B and C compared to group A. Fig. 5 shows that the main micro-organism responsible for infection in burn patients was Staphylococcus aureus, which represents 46% of positive swabs isolated from burn patients, a result consistent with that obtained by Ugburo et al.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, however, remains a serious cause of infection and septic mortality in burns, particularly when acquired nosocomially;58 it continues to be the predominant species isolated from burn patients even after the use of topical povidone-iodine ointment. Povidone-iodine is the combination of molecular iodine and the polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone;59 it has bactericidal,60 sporicidal,61 viricidal,62 and fungicidal63 effects. Since local infection and burn wound sepsis are among the severest problems in the treatment of thermally injured patients, early treatment with topical antiseptics decreases the infection rate and improves the survival rate of burn patients;58 in addition, with the proliferation of antibiotic- and antiseptic-resistant strains of bacteria around the world, attention is increasingly being focused on more traditional and untraditional methods for combating and preventing wound infection.64 Clinical studies have demonstrated that treatment with povidone-iodine is the most effective method against bacterial and fungal infection in burn patients.65 In contrast, Cetinkale et al.66 demonstrated that large burns were profoundly immunosuppressive and that the early use of antioxidant therapy was able to significantly restore cell-mediated immunity, which may explain the results presented in Table III in cases where treatment involved a topical antioxidant, such as povidone-iodine ointment, alone or in combination with systemic antioxidants like vitamin E and vitamin C.
Many recent data have demonstrated the cause-and-effect relationship between plasma oxidative parameters and mortality in patients with burn injury.35 Post-burn multiple organ failure (MOF) occurs mainly in patients with a high burn percentage, and MOF mortality was found to be directly proportional to the number of organs involved67 - the incidence of pulmonary failure was the highest,68 and the highest mortality was attributed to renal failure.69 MOF occurring in the early stage was more often related to burn shock, while MOF occurring in the late stage was due mainly to infection.
It has been shown that oxygen free radicals play an important role in the genesis and development of post-burn MOF. It has been found that antiperoxidation ability declines, reactive oxygen species increase, and lipid peroxidation becomes excessive after burn injury.67 Results obtained by Horton in 1996 suggested that xanthine-oxidase-mediated free radical production contributed, in part, to post-burn alterations in cardiac function,70 while Maass et al. showed that burn trauma activated myocardial NF-kappa B and promoted cardiomyocyte secretion of TNF-alpha, and that this inflammatory cascade preceded the appearance of cardiac dysfunction, indicating that cardiac myocyte-derived TNF-alpha contributed, in part, to post-burn cardiac contractile deficits.71 Horton et al.72 made the interesting finding that in cases of burn trauma antioxidant vitamin therapy provided cardioprotection, at least in part, by inhibiting translocation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B and by interrupting cardiac inflammatory cytokine secretion of TNF-alpha.72 La Londe et al.73 showed that antioxidants, administered post-burn, restored antioxidant defences, attenuated the altered cell energetics, and prevented mortality, indicating that oxidants were the cause of mortality; these data also suggest that there is a critical value in the decrease of antioxidant defences that results in mortality. Our data (Table IV), in agreement with all these findings, indicate the beneficial effect of antioxidants in reducing the mortality rate when administered to burn patients. Table IV shows a significant difference in healing time between groups B and C - there are no data available for group A since all the patients died after two to three weeks in the burn unit. The use of systemic antioxidant vitamins in addition to topical antioxidant in group C significantly (p < 0.05) reduced healing time compared to group B, in which only topical povidone-iodine ointment was used.
Recent data have shown that povidone-iodine is widely used in the local treatment of burn wounds;74,75 Juhasz76 showed that povidone-iodine was beneficial to burn wounds owing to its effect in reducing bacterial colony counts, and he suggested that the use of povidone-iodine was safe in a clinical setting. Our results are compatible with these, as regards the effectiveness and safety of the topical use of povidone-iodine in burn patients. Also, the formation of eschars after use of povidone-iodine ointment in burn patients can be easily treated with 10% salicylic acid without any problems and avoiding surgical escharotomy. Many researchers have proved the protective effect of povidone-iodine ointment against skin lesions induced by chemical and thermal stimuli;77 and clinical experience with patients after accidental heat burns has shown that the topical application of povidone-iodine ointment immediately after the stimulus significantly reduces, and often prevents, skin lesions. Furthermore, apart from being a safe and widely used disinfectant, povidone-iodine ointment can be considered an efficient protective agent against skin toxicity caused by hazardous chemicals and heat stimuli.
Wormser et al.80 showed that reduced collagenolytic activity might be one of the mechanisms by which iodine protects the skin against chemical insults, which may explain the considerable difference in healing time in the group treated with povidone-iodine ointment compared to group A, in which where there was no healing at all. Khodr et al.81 showed that treatment with an antioxidant, namely vitamin E, reduced the time required for complete wound closure of full-thickness burn injury, while another study82 showed that use of antioxidants, namely vitamin E and vitamin C, hastened the epithelialization process, results with which our data are compatible.
Table IV shows that treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the cost calculated on a per day basis, while results obtained by Wormser et al.80 indicated that use of povidone-iodine reduced the collagenase activity found in the skin, which might explain the reduction in oozing and fluid loss in burn patients. This in turn led to decreased fluid requirement in the patients, which might effectively reduce the cost. In addition, the decrease in oozing reduced the change of bedclothes from once daily to every other day, which reduced costs.
The systemic administration of vitamins E and C in addition to topical use of povidone-iodine ointment significantly reduced costs (p < 0.05) compared to group B, which was treated with topical povidone-iodine ointment only.
Huang et al.83 found that endogenous circulating factors played a role in post-burn microvascular leakage; recent studies suggest that reactive oxygen species generated by thermal injury are involved in the increased microvascular permeability, oedema formation, and tissue damage associated with burns.
In view of these findings, the administration of antioxidants may be of great benefit. Tanaka et al.85,86 showed that the administration of an elevated dose of ascorbic acid during the first 24 h after thermal injury significantly reduced resuscitation fluid volume requirements and wound oedema, while Matsuda et al.87 found that high-dose vitamin C infusion maintained haemodynamic stability in the presence of a reduced resuscitation fluid volume, provided that vitamin C was administered for a minimum of 8 h post-burn.
In contrast, Tanaka et al.88 showed that after delayed initiation of high-dose ascorbic acid therapy, the 24-h fluid resuscitation volume dropped to 32.5% of the Parkland formula, while Matsuda et al.89 found that the administration of high-dose vitamin C to burn patients reduced the total 24-h resuscitation volume from 4 ml/kg/% burn to 1 ml/kg/% burn; all these results could explain vitamin C’s role in the reduction in fluid resuscitation volume required for burn patients, effectively reducing the cost of treatment. This may explain our results presented in Table IV.
To sum up, the reduction in healing time shown in Table IV played an important role in reducing costs, since the duration of hospitalization was reduced by two days, leading to a significant reduction in the cost of treatment calculated on a per course basis.
This study showed the involvement of oxidative stress parameters in the pathogenicity of thermally injured patients manifested as elevation in the plasma level of MDA; it also showed the end product of lipid peroxidation and a reduction in the plasma level of GSH, the natural antioxidant, compared to healthy subjects. Another finding was that treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment significantly improved these parameters, indicating the antioxidant effect of topical povidone-iodine ointment when used to treat burns. The exact mechanism by which povidone-iodine ointment exerts its antioxidant effect requires further deep investigation.
Treatment with topical povidone-iodine ointment alone or in combination with systemic vitamin E and vitamin C not only improved the oxidative stress condition in thermally injured patients but also effectively interfered with the incidence of infection and significantly reduced it; it also significantly reduced the mortality rate and healing time and effectively reduced the cost of treatment, compared to classical treatment.
It is important to bear in mind that the treatment of thermally injured patients with topical povidone-iodine ointment alone in combination with systemic vitamin E and vitamin C was safe and had no effect on thyroid gland function or on liver and renal function tests during the course of treatment.
RESUME. But. Les brûlures constituent un important problème dans le monde entier qui est accompagné d’une mortalité et morbidité élevée et des pertes économiques, même en cas de brûlures mineures. Il est possible que certains progrès dans les protocoles des soins médicaux qui dépendent d’un nouveau mécanisme intéressé à la pathogénicité des brûlures, c’est-à-dire le stress oxidatif (comme par exemple l’emploi de la polyvidone iodée seule ou en combinaison avec la vitamine E et la vitamine C), améliorent les résultats et réduisent les coûts économiques. Patients et méthodes. Trente-huit patients atteints de lésions thermiques provenant d’une variété de groupes d’âge, de sexe et de métier et d’extension de brûlure, hospitalisés dans l’Unité des Brûlures de l’Hôpital Général de Baquba, Iraq, ont été suivis dans cet essai clinique. Les Auteurs de l’étude ont divisé les patients en trois groupes: groupe A (8 patients), traité selon la pratique de l’hôpital; groupe B (17 patients), traité avec l’onguent de polyvidone iodée topique; et groupe C (13 patients), traité avec l’onguent de polyvidone iodée topique associé à une dose systémique une fois par jour de 400 mg de vitamine E et de 500 mg de vitamine C, en plus de l’antibiotique classique employé dans notre hôpital. Dans chaque groupe de paramètres de stress oxidatif, les Auteurs ont utilisé des méthodes standard pour effectuer le test de la fonction thyroïdienne, hépatique et rénale, des études microbiologiques, des évaluations du taux de mortalité et du temps de guérison et enfin des études de nature économique. Résultats. Les Auteurs ont trouvé que le traitement avec l’onguent de polyvidone iodée topique ou en combinaison avec la vitamine E et la vitamine C systémique avait un effet bénéficial significatif sur l’amélioration des paramètres de stress oxidatif, le taux de mortalité, le temps de guérison, et le coût; en outre, cette modalité de traitement n’avait aucun effet négatif thyroïdien, hépatique ou rénal. Conclusion. Le traitement des patients atteints de lésions thermiques moyennant l’onguent de polyvidone iodée topique a amélioré en manière significative les paramètres de stress oxidatif, ce qui indiquait son effet antioxidant. Il faudra effectuer d’autres recherches pour expliquer l’exacte mécanisme par lequel la polyvidone iodée exerce cet effet antioxidant. Le traitement avec l’onguent de polyvidone iodée topique seul ou en combinaison avec la vitamine E et C systémique améliore en manière significative les résultats que l’on peut obtenir dans le traitement des patients atteints de lésions thermiques, sans exposer les patients à aucun risque, grâce au mécanisme récemment découvert - le stress oxidatif - intéressé à la pathogenèse des brûlures.
| This paper was received on 25 July 2004. Address correspondence to: Dr Ahmed Salih Sahib, Department of Pharmacy, Diyala Health Directorate, Diyala, Iraq. E-mail: ahmedsalih73@yahoo.com |
Return to Contents page |