Annals of the MBC - vol. 5 - n' I - March 1992
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BURN PATIENTS AFTER
TREATMENT WITH MORE AGGRESSIVE SURGICAL TECHNIOUES IN WOUND CARE
Luengo Matos S., Herruzo Cabrera R., Garcia
Torres V., Fernandez Arjona M., Rey Calero J.
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva de UAM
y Unidad de Quemados de HRT, La Paz, Madrid, España
SUMMARY.
All 1367 patients admitted to a Bums Centre during the period 1971-1986 were considered
retrospectively on the basis of the treatment administered in two sub-periods, before and
after January 1982, when modifications in therapy were introduced (more aggressive
surgery, more antibiotic prophylaxis, more parenteral feeding, different topical
treatment). The comparison between the results showed better evolution of the bum disease
in the second sub-period, as measured by a number of parameters.
Introduction
Burns are still today a very important problem, being one of the most frequent causes of
death after traffic accidents (1).
Today the treatment in a Burn Unit has proved its efficacy (2).
The new analgesics and topical antibiotics, discoveries in the knowledge of human
physiology and modern surgical techniques, together with the appropriate personnel in Burn
Units, are the very important tools that have improved burn patient treatment (3, 4).
Nowadays one of the most important aims is to achieve early surgical debridement and early
burn cover with skin graft. Using these aggressive surgical techniques, we obtain a better
patient evolution, a decrease in infection and hospitalization time, and an increase in
patient survival (5, 6, 7, 8, 9).
This paper attempts to assess whether or not the evolution of our burn patients has
changed since we introduced these new surgical techniques for wound treatment in our Bum
Unit.
We consider the main burn gravity factors capable of modifying the evolution of the
patients; we also consider other treatments we introduced in our Unit to improve the care
of burn patients.
Material and methods
We selected, retrospectively, 1367 patients admitted to the Critical Ward of the Bum Unit
of La Paz Medical Center over a 15-year period (from 1971 to 1986). These patients
exemplify all the patients admitted to this Unit during these years and represent 50% of
the total patients. All patient data were recorded in one protocol.
This special protocol reports the evolution of the patient during hospitalization and the
characteristics of the patients on admission.
We used this protocol with the 1367 patients in the study. The patients were split into
two periods (patients admitted from January 1971 to December 1981, and patients admitted
from January 1982 to December 1986). After 1982 we began to use more aggressive surgical
techniques such as:
- early surgical debridement
- early burn cover.
In the last years of the second period, we
introduced other improvements in general patient care, such as:
- antibiotic prophylaxis
- better topical treatment
- increased parenteral feeding.
We recorded 17 variables, grouped into
three series:
- Epidemiologic characteristics (this is important because it
enabled us to compare the gravity of the patients in both periods):
- Sex
- age burn depth
- body area burned
- burn localization
- other associated injuries
- previous pathology
- Treatment variables:
- days until first debridement
- days until complete debridement
- days until first skin graft cover
- days until complete cover
- number of skin grafts
- topical treatment
- parenteral feeding
- antibiotic prophylaxis
- Evolution of patient variables:
- main complication after burn
- functional consequences of burn
- death
- length of hospitalization.
We used average and percentage comparison
in order to discover differences between the two periods.
Results
Patients in the second period had higher age and body area burned than in the first (37.2
years vs 32.1 years and 13.4% vs 11.9%, respectively).
The numbers of subdermic lesions were higher in the second period than in the first (26.8%
vs 17.5%). There was no statistical difference regarding sex (Tables 1 and 11). We did not
find any differences from the other epidemiologic characteristics, except trachcobronchial
damage (4.8% vs 12.9%) (Tables Ill, IV and V).
We also improved our treatment, using new methods, and we reduced the number of days until
complete debridement of the wound, until the first skin graft cover and until the complete
cover of the burn (Table V1); the number of skin grafts increased in the second period
(Table VII). The improvements in topical treatments can be seen in Table VIII. We obtained
an increase in the use of silver sulphadiazine or excipient, and a decrease in the use o
nitrofurazone in the second period. The number of patients with antibiotic prophylaxis and
parenteral feeding was higher in the second period (Tables IX and X).
Renal and infectious complications fell in the second period (8% vs 1.2% and 27.6% vs
15.8%, respectively); other complications did not change (Table Xl).
Unimportant functional consequences increased in the second period, and grave ones
decreased (8.8% vs 5.5%); unimportant and grave psychic consequences decreased (9.4% vs
14.3% and 2.9% vs 1.3% respectively) (Table XII).
The number of patients who died was lower in the second period (7% vs 6.1%) (Table XIll).
Hospitalization time also decreased in the second period (27.2 days vs 23.5 days).
Discussion
If we consider the three major factors of burn danger (age, body area burned and burn
depth) we can see that patients in the second period are in more danger than those in the
first period. Regarding age, however, we must consider that our Unit currently admits only
adults. Thus in the first period we admitted 13% patients under 10 years old, against 3.5%
in the second period; some authors think that burned children are more problematic than
adults (10).
There is no significant difference between the two periods regarding the other
epidemiologic characteristics, 6xcept in tracheobronchial damage, which increased
significantly in the second period, possibly because we improved the discriminatory
diagnosis of inhalation syndrome in the last years (11).
In line with the latest tendency favouring the advantages of rapid debridement and early
cover, we introduced this proced0re in our Burn Unit. This caused an important decrease in
the "complete cover time" (9). During 1986-1987 Garcia Torres (12) found in our
Unit: 3.3 days until the first debridement, 6 days until complete debridement, and 13.6
days until complete cover of the bum; this shows important changes in this respect, and
that we are maintaining the decreasing tendency.
We used silver sulphadiazine in the second period and nitrofurazone in the first; both
products are considered today elective treatment (13), although the first is active
against Gram positive and Gram negative, while the second is active only against Gram
positive (12).
Antibiotic prophylaxis increased in the second period. Nowadays nobody systematically uses
antibiotic parenteral prophylaxis, which is used only in well-documented infections (14).
In the last years of the second period we introduced two new techniques, which have proved
their efficacy. These are:
- intestinal selective decolonization (15)
- prophylaxis before surgery (15, 16).
We have also increased the number of
patients with parenteral feeding in an attempt to avoid the effects of catabolism of the
burn, but for this purpose oral hyper-feeding is better if possible (17).
We found that renal and infectious complications were lower in the second period.
There is a relationship between the reduction of infections and early debridement and
covering of the burn (18), but we think that other factors, such as antibacterial topical
treatment, parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis and improvements in general care, may be
associated with the decrease in the number of infections (19, 20).
We also found an association between the use of this aggressive technique and the
reduction in the number of functional consequences, as in other authors (2 1).
Thompkins et al. (8) reported a reduction in hospitalization time (32 days to 22 days)
when they began to use this technique; we obtained a sifnilar reduction, as in other
authors (8).
Currery et al. did not1find a relationship between the use of this technique and patient
survival, as they selected the patients who had a low death risk for their surgical
procedures (1, 22).
We think that this relationship exists, and our patients had a higher survival when we
used this aggressive technique. Some authors do not agree with usJl).
Thompkins et al. (8) say that the best results in patient survival using early self skin
graft are obtained with old people, but as we did not have sufficient deaths we could not
investigate this possibility.
Thompkins et al. (8) also noted that with regard to patient survival it is difficult to
separate the effect of aggressive surgical treatment from other improvements, such as:
- immunology situation of the patient
- advances in metabolic care
- advantages in monitorization and respiratory support better
nutrition and general care.
Finally, our patients had a better
evolution after we used the new surgical treatments, but we think it is necessary to
perform new epidemiologic studies in order to ascertain the real effects of this
treatment. Clark et al. (23) say that it is necessary to develop a "burn gravity
index" to be able to assess the efficacy of the different cares for burn patients.
|
First
Period
(71 - 81) |
Second
period
(82 - 86) |
Sex (%) |
|
|
- Male |
60.1 |
63.1 |
- Female |
39.9 |
36.9 |
Age (years)
(X +/- SM) |
32.1 |
21.2 |
37.2 |
19.5 |
B.A.B. (%)
(X +/- SM) |
11.9 |
15.2 |
13.4 |
15.9 |
(*) p < 0.0 1 x
+/- Sm: Mean Standard Deviation
B.A.B.: Body Area Burned
(ns): not significant |
|
Table I Sex, age and body area burned
depending on the periods |
|
Depth |
First Period
(71 - 81) |
Second period
(82 - 86) |
Epidermic |
2.2 |
0.5 |
Superficial dermic |
38.2 |
33.3 |
Deep dermic |
41.3 |
39.4 |
Subdermic |
17.5 |
26.8 (*) |
(*) p <
0.01 |
|
Table II Depth of the burn depending on the periods |
|
Localization |
First
Period |
Second
period |
|
N |
% |
N |
% |
Head |
- yes |
432 |
47.1 |
219 |
49.4 |
|
- no |
485 |
52.9 |
224 |
50.6 |
Eye |
- yes |
141 |
15.4 |
92 |
20.8 |
|
- no |
773 |
84.6 |
351 |
79.2 |
Neck |
- yes |
332 |
36.1 |
198 |
44.8 |
|
- no |
587 |
63.9 |
244 |
55.2 |
S. ext. |
- yes |
599 |
65.3 |
308 |
69.5 |
|
- no |
319 |
34.7 |
135 |
30.5 |
I. ext. |
- yes |
478 |
52.1 |
234 |
52.8 |
|
- no |
439 |
47.9 |
209 |
47.2 |
Hand |
- yes |
485 |
52.8 |
260 |
58.7 |
|
- no |
433 |
47.9 |
183 |
41.2 |
Trunk |
- yes |
368 |
40.2 |
217 |
49.0 |
|
- no |
547 |
59.8 |
226 |
51.0 |
Peri. |
- yes |
83 |
9.1 |
53 |
12.0 |
|
- no |
831 |
90.9 |
390 |
88.0 |
Foot |
- yes |
49 |
5.4 |
29 |
6.5 |
|
- no |
864 |
94.6 |
414 |
93.5 |
Tracheo- |
- yes |
43 |
4.8 |
57 |
12.9(*) |
bronchial |
- no |
859 |
95.2 |
384 |
87.1 |
p < 0. 0 1
S. ext: Superior extremity
I. ext: Inferior extremity
Peri: Perineum |
|
Table III Distribution of associated injuries depending on
the periods |
|
Associated
Injuries |
First Period |
Second period |
(N |
1V0) |
(N |
%) |
YES |
68 |
7.8 |
44 |
10.4 |
NO |
799 |
92.2 |
381 |
89.6 |
|
Table IV Distribution of associated injuries
depending on the periods |
|
Previous pathology |
First
Period |
Second
period |
(N |
%) |
(N |
%) |
Epileptic |
34 |
4.8 |
11 |
2.5 |
Hepatic |
6 |
0.9 |
18 |
4.1 |
Cardiac |
15 |
2.1 |
15 |
3.4 |
Pulmonary |
to |
1.4 |
9 |
2.1 |
Urological |
6 |
0.9 |
9 |
2.1 |
Neurological |
20 |
2.9 |
24 |
5.5 |
Gastrointestinal |
11 |
1.6 |
22 |
5.0 |
Alcoholic |
9 |
1.3 |
6 |
1.4 |
Others |
33 |
4.7 |
43 |
9.8 |
No previouspathology |
539 |
79.5 |
280 |
64.1 |
|
Table V Previous pathology depending on the
periods |
|
Topical Treatment |
First
Period |
Second
period |
N |
% |
N |
% |
No drugs |
93 |
13.4 |
25 |
5.8 |
Silver sulphadiazine |
110 |
15.9 |
109 |
2 5.2 |
Sulphamilon (R) |
66 |
9.5 |
1 |
0.2 |
Silver nitrate |
1 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.0 |
Furacin (R) |
308 |
44.4 |
64 |
14.8 (*) |
Steroids |
6 |
0.9 |
0 |
0.0 |
Antibiotics |
34 |
4.9 |
2 |
0.4 |
Excipient |
7 |
1.0 |
220 |
50.9 |
Betadine (R) |
15 |
2.2 |
1 |
0.2 |
Others |
53 |
7.6 |
10 |
2.3 |
|
Table VIII Topical treatment depending on
the periods |
|
Number of skin grafts |
First
Period |
Second
period |
(N |
%) |
(N |
%) |
One |
239 |
30.4 |
158 |
38.3 |
Two |
72 |
9.1 |
40 |
9.7 |
Three |
22 |
2.8 |
20 |
4.8 |
Four |
10 |
1.3 |
5 |
1.2 |
None |
444 |
56.4 |
189 |
45.8 |
|
Table IX Parenteral feeding depending on the
periods |
|
Antibiotic Prophylactic |
First
Period |
Second
period |
N |
% |
N |
% |
YES |
40 |
5.9 |
56 |
13.2 |
NO |
638 |
94.1 |
367 |
86.8 |
|
Table X Antibiotic prophylactic depending on
the periods |
|
Main Complication |
First Period |
Second period |
N |
% |
N |
% |
Neuropsychic |
27 |
13.6 |
29 |
17.0 |
Vascular |
13 |
6.5 |
15 |
8.8 |
Respiratory |
32 |
16.1 |
28 |
16.4 |
Renal |
16 |
8.0 |
2 |
1.2 |
Cardiac |
4 |
2.0 |
5 |
2.9 |
Hepatic |
1 |
0.5 |
1 |
0.6 |
Gastrointestinal |
11 |
5.5 |
10 |
5.8 |
Infectious |
55 |
27.6 |
27 |
15.8 |
Post-transfusional |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
0.6 |
Others |
40 |
20.1 |
53 |
31.0 |
|
Table XII Main consequences of the burn
depending on the periods |
|
RESUME Tons les patients (1367) hospitalisés dans notre Centre
de Brfflés pendant la période 1971-1986 ont été analysés en mani&re
rétrospective sur la base du traitement pratiqué dans les deux sous-périodes avant et
aprés janvier 1982, quand nous avons modifié nos méthodes thérapeutiques (opérations
chirurgicales plus agressives, augmentation de la prophylaxie antibiotique, augmentation
de Falimentation parentérale, modifications au traitement topique). La comparaison entre
les résultats des deux sous-périodes indique une évolution meilleure des conditions du
bré1é, dans la deuxi&me periode, selon divers param&tres d'évaluation.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Currery P.W., Lutterman A., Brawn D.W., Shires G.T.:
Analysis of survival and hospitalization time for 937 patients. Ann. Surg., 192: 472-478,
1980.
- Lau C.: Cost of burn care. The Bulletin and Clinical Review
of Burn Injuries, 1: 57, 1984.
- Pinnegar M.D.: History of burn care. A survey of important
changes in the topical treatment of thermal injuries. Burns, 12: 491-495, 1986.
- agheb S.A., Qaryoute S., EI Mulitaseb H.: Mortality of bum
injuries in Jordan. Burns, 10: 439-443, 1984.
- Burke J.F., Bondoc C.C., Quimby W.C.: Primary burn excision
and immediate grafting: a method shortening illness. The Journal of Trauma, 14: 389-395,
1974.
- Janjic G., Najelanovic Z., Mihajlovic R., Toure B.M.:
Prevention of infection in burns. The Bulletin and Clinical Review of Burn Injuries, 1:
24, 1984.
- Burdge J.J., Katz B., Edwards R., Ruberg R.: Surgical
treatment of bums in elderly patients. The Journal of Trauma, 28: 214-217, 1988.
- Thompkins R.G., Burke J.F., Schoenfeld D.A. et al.: Prompt
eschar excision: a treatment system contributing to reduced burn mortality. Ann. Surg., 3:
272-281, 1986.
- Wolfe R.A., Roi L.D., Flora J.D., Feller I., Cornell R.G.:
Mortality differences and speed of wound closure among specialized burn care facilities.
J.A.M.A. 250: 763-766, 1983.
- Wachtel T.L.: Epidemiology, classification, initial care
and administrative considerations for critically burned patients. In: "Critical Care
Clinics", 3-27, ed. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1985.
- Moylan J.A., Chan C.K.: Inhalation injury: an increasing
problem. Surgery, 188: 34-37, 1978.
- Garcia Torres V.: -Quemaduras. Tratamiento de Urgencia-,
ed. Dupliar Farmacéutica S.A., Madrid, 1989.
- Herruzo Cabrera R., Garcia Torres V., Rey Calero J.:
Control de la infección en enfermos quemados. Cirugia Plástica lbero-Latinoamericana,
14: 189-195, 1989.
- Haburchac D.R., Pruitt B.A. Jr.: Use of systemic
antibiotics in the burned patient. Surg. Clin. North. Am., 58: 1119-1132, 1978.
- Luterman A., Dacso C., Currery P.W.: Infections in burn
patients. The American Journal of Medicine, 81: 45-52, 1986.
- Sasaki T.M., Welch G.H., Herdon D.M.: Burn wound
manipulation induced bacteriernia. The Journal of Trauma, 19:46-50, 1976.
- Klasen H.J., Ten Duis H.J.: Early oral feeding of patients
with extensive burns. Burns, 13: 49-52, 1987.
- Wachtel T.L.: Complications of the bum injury. In:
"Critical Care Clinics". 175-186, ed. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1985.
- Herruzo Cabrera R., Garcia Torres V., Rey Calero J.:
Estudio epidemiológico de la ínfección hospitalaria en una Unidad de Quemados durante
dos años.
- art. Evaluación global. Rev. Esp. Microbiol. Clin., 4:
145-150, 1989.
- Horton R.C., Snelling C.F.T., Courtemanche A.D. et al.:
Influence of early excision and closure, nutrition, topical and systemic antibacterials on
wound infection. The Bulletin and Clinical Review of Bum Injuries, 1: 26-27, 1984.
- Anous M.M., Heimbach D.M.: Causes of death and predictors
in burned patients more than 60 years of age. The Journal of Trauma, 26: 135-139, 1986.
- Currery P.W. (closing discussion): Analysis of survival and
hospitalization time for 937 patients. Ann. Surg., 192: 477-478, 1980.
- Clark W.R., Fromm B.S.: Bum mortality. The Bulletin and
Clinical Review of Burn injuries, 1: 61-62, 1984.
|