Ann. Medit. Burns Club - vol. VIII - n. 3 - September 1995

COST/BENEFIT VALUE OF A BURN UNIT AT THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT MEDICAL CENTER

Atiyeh B.S., Saba M.

American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon


SUMMARY. In order to assess the value of establishing a burn unit at the American University of Beirut Medical Center, a retrospective study was conducted on all burn patients admitted to the Centre between 1975 and 1993. All patients were entered into the hospital computer system following the ninth Revision of the International Classification of diseases. A total of 787 patients were computed, with an overall mortality rate of 13.98%. An average of 40 to 45 burn patients were admitted to the hospital each year, constituting about 0.25% of all hospital admissions and 1% of all surgical admissions. Distribution of the burns by age, sex, involvement of specific anatomic sites and extent was evaluated. Despite the fact that these patients were treated in a regular surgical ward, the final outcome was not worse than that reported from major burns centres. This raised the question of the wisdom of establishing a small burn unit in a private institution with tight budgetary restrictions. It may be economically much wiser in small countries like Lebanon to establish one central burn unit with the assistance of the governmental authorities instead of creating highly expensive small units. Nevertheless, the necessity of having a burn centre in a teaching institution should not be overlooked. The academic value of such a centre by far justifies the cost.

Introduction

In order to assess the value of establishing a small burn unit at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUB-MC), a retrospective study was conducted on all burn patients admitted to our centre between 1975 and 1993. Any feasibility study for the establishment of a burn unit should start by estimating the needs of the community. Unfortunately, valid national burn statistics and burn epidemiological studies are not available in Lebanon. The AUB-MC being the biggest and most prestigious medical referral centre in the country, in addition to having been the only properly functioning hospital in the western sector of the city during the long Lebanese war which corresponds to the study period, it was judged that burn patients admitted to our hospital roughly reflected the community burn status. A total of 787 burn patients were admitted for an average of 40 to 45 burn victims a year. Many more of course were treated on an ambulatory basis and many patients had to be transferred to other hospitals for lack of space, but almost all the transferable critically burned patients presenting to our emergency room were admitted.

Material and methods

All patients admitted to the hospital were entered into the hospital computer system following the ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. As became evident, the entering data of the 787 burn patients were not accurate. Many lacked an exact estimate of the extent of the burn injury, and many more lacked an exact reference to the anatomic distribution of burns. Any detailed analysis would have necessitated the review of charts, but for the sake of the present study the data gathered were adequate to reach valid conclusions.

Results

Between 1975 and 1993, 787 burn patients were admitted to our hospital for an average of 40 to 45 patients a year, corresponding to 0.25% of all hospital admission and 1% of all surgical admissions. Of the bum patients admitted 59.34% were male and 40.66% female (Fig. 1). 70.65% of the patients were under 30 years of age, and 32.15% were under the age of 9 years (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1 - Sex distribution of admitted burn patients (320 females, 467 males) Fig. 1 - Sex distribution of admitted burn patients (320 females, 467 males)

Sex distribution of admitted burn patients

Thirty-eight per cent had burns in more than 50% TBSA (Fig. 3). Information about burns in specific areas of the body was available for 466 patients. 36.5% had burns in the upper extremities, 15% in the hands, 49% in the lower extremities and 315 in both the trunk and the head and neck area (Fig. 4).

img0000051.jpg (5519 byte) iFig. 2 - Age distribution of admitted burn patients
Fig. 2 - Age distribution of admitted burn patients

 

% TSBA

N' patients

%

0-29

81

35

30-49

60

27

50-69

37

16

70~89

33

15

>90

15

7

Total

228

 
Fig. 3 - Distribution of admitted burn patients by % TBSA burn.
Fig. 3 - Distribution of admitted burn patients by % TBSA burn.

 

Location

N' patients

% Total

Upper extremities

170

36.48

Hands

69

14.81

Lower extremities

224

48.05

Trunk

145

31.16

Head and neck

145

31.16

Fig. 4 - Distribution of admitted burn patients by anatomical bum distribution (466 patients).

Fig. 4 - Distribution of admitted burn patients by anatomical bum distribution (466 patients).

The overall mortality rate was 14%. Of the deceased patients 52% were female and 48% male. 61.5% were under 30 years of age. The relative mortality rate for males was 11 % and for females 18% (Fig. 5). The relative mortality for the various age groups ranged between I I and 23% and the mortality rate increased with age (Fig. 6). 228 patients were classified according to percentage TBSA burn. In these patients mortality rose sharply in burns of more than 70% TBSA and reached 100% in bums of more than 90% (Fig. 7). The time of death was mostly within the first week or else more than 15 days after the bum injury (Fig. 8).

Fig. 5 - Mortality of admitted burn patients by sex Fig. 5 - Mortality of admitted burn patients by sex
Fig. 5 - Mortality of admitted burn patients by sex Fig. 5 - Mortality of admitted burn patients by sex

Discussion

The most striking feature about this analysis is the small number of burn patients admitted per year and the extremely small percentage of bum admissions compared to total hospital admissions.

img0000056.jpg (11933 byte) Fig. 6 - Mortality rate of admitted burn patients by % TBSA burn.

This definitely does not mean that burn injuries are rare in Lebanon - it means that serious burns with life-threatening conditions could be relatively rare. In the absence of accurate statistics, it not possible to know this for certain, but as things stand now there is more demand for treatment of less critical burns than for life-threatening lesions, to judge by the large number of patients presenting to our out-patient clinic with burn contractures. Such bums are mostly attended to by a senior member of the family, a neighbour, a pharmacist and very often by a fireman in the infirmary of the local fire stations, but only rarely by a physician and hardly ever by a plastic surgeon in a major referral centre.

% TBSA

N' patients

N' deceased

% deceased

0-29

81

4

4.94

30-49

60

14

23.33

50-69

37

13

35.14

70-89

33

24

72.73

>90

15

15

100.00

Total

228

65

 
Fig. 7 - Mortality rate of admitted bum patients by % TBSA bum.
Fig. 7 - Mortality rate of admitted bum patients by % TBSA bum.

 

Days post-burn

N' patients

1

21

2

10

3

11

4

6

5

5

6

10

7

6

8

5

9

4

10

3

11

4

12

1

13

2

14

2

15

0

>15

20

Fig. 8 - Time of death after burn injury.
Fig. 8 - Time of death after burn injury.

The majority of minor burns and sometimes more serious burns are treated at local fire stations with a topical ointment, the composition of which is keptjealously secret by the fire brigade. Patients are referred late to our centre only if they fail to heal after several weeks or months of topical treatment or because of contractures.
The second point worth discussing is the fact that despite the lack of a formal burn unit in our centre the final outcome of the treatment of major burn victims, expressed by mortality figures alone, is comparable to that reported from major burn centres. However, if we look at these mortality figures more closely, we notice that the percent~ age of deceased burn patients within the first six days postburn is 57% of the total deceased, which is relatively high. This is probably a reflection of the lack of a standard intensive care set-up for the resuscitation of burn patients. The incidence of bum wound sepsis needs however to be determined by proper chart analysis since adequate isolation and proper tub-bathing facilities were not available. If we consider the mortality figures 15 days after the burn injury as the final reflection of burn wound sepsis, a mortality rate of 2.54% of all admitted burn patients is almost negligible, indicating either a low incidence of burn wound sepsis, which is unlikely, or successful antibiotic therapy, the effect of which on the duration and cost of hospitalization needs to be assessed.
At the beginning of 1994 we stopped using the tub bath for our patients, as recommended by various burn centres. The effect of this measure needs to be evaluated. This change amounts to a redefinition of the facilities that must be available in a burn unit. With the universal acceptance of early excision and grafting, the most important factor in a bum unit nowadays, besides the intensive care set-up, is strict isolation and asepsis during handling of the patients. Rehabilitation during and after burn wound healing is of utmost importance. This is probably the main benefit of a burn unit that we lack.
Of the burn patients admitted 32% were under nine years of age. A good proportion of these were babies or infants, which raises the question of child neglect and abuse. Despite the fact that this issue remains a real taboo in our society and despite the usual unconscious collective denial of its occurrence, it is time that the problem of child neglect and abuse was seriously addressed in our society. To this regard, the hospital social worker should take a serious interest in every burn victim under nine years of age. A major effort to update Lebanese child protection legislation is also in order.
The tremendous cost of any bum unit is a major deterrent for most private hospitals and definitely for health authorities in developing countries. Only large centres possessing major subsidies can establish and maintain sound cost/benefit burn units. The establishment of mini-burn units in several small hospitals in Lebanon is definitely economic suicide, due to'the relatively small number of major burn victims. What we need is one central referral burn unit with multiple day-care bum centres for ambulatory patients. These services must be totally or partially free of charge if we are to have any hope of putting a stop to the treatment of bums in local fire stations.
From the academic point of view, a teaching institution must possess its own burn unit irrespective of the cost. The opportunities for research development offered by a burn unit are tremendous for various medical specialities, be it basic science or clinical. Every effort should be made to convince the proper hospital and university authorities of the benefits of having the National Central Bum Unit established at AUB-MC.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the needs for a small country like Lebanon in the field of burn management are the following:

  1. The establishment of multiple day-care burn centres for the proper management o~minor bum injuries and the diagnosis of more serious conditions, requiring early excision and grafting, for proper referral.
  2. The establishment of one central burn unit that would treat all major bum injuries. The dimensions of the country are relatively small, and with proper means of transportation any burn victim can be transferred quickly to the central unit in Beirut. This bum unit will have to be largely subsidized, since none of our private health institutions could afford the expense.
  3. The establishment of a special rehabilitation centre dealing preferentially with post-burn problems.
  4. The affiliation of this central bum unit to one of the three medical schools in Lebanon, preferably the American University of Beirut because of its more structured postgraduate training programmes and better academic facilities.
  5. The creation of a National Burn Registry to gather all data necessary for the much needed valid statistical analyses and epidemiological studies.

Prevention of burns is always the best treatment. Education of the public is of extreme importance, and more important still is the education of the Lebanese population about proper bum management and where it can be delivered, so that our fire stations will cease to be the major burn treatment centres.

RESUME. Pour évaluer l'utilité de créer une unité de brûlures au Centre Médical de l'Université Américaine de Beyrouth, les auteurs ont effectué une étude rétrospective de tous les patients hospitalisés dans leur centre entre 1975 et 1993. Tous les patients ont été entrés dans le système informatique de l'hôpital selon la neuvième révision de la classification internationale des maladies. En tout 787 patients ont été évalués, avec un taux de mortalité de 13,98%. En moyenne 40 à 45 patients ont été hospitalisés tous les ans, ce qui représente environ 0.25% de toutes les hospitalisations et 1 % des hospitalisations qui nécessitaient un traitement chirurgical. La distribution des brûlures selon l'âge, le sexe, la présence de lésions dans des sites anatomiques particuliers et l'étendue a été évaluée. Ces patients ont été traités dans une salle chirurgicale normale mais quand même les résultats finals n'étaient pas inférieurs aux résultats obtenus dans les grands Centres de Brûlés. Cette considération a soulevé la question de la prudence de la création d'une petite unité de brûlures chez une institution privée avec des restrictions budgétaires très serrées. Il pourrait être économiquement plus sensé dans les petits pays comme le Liban d'établir une unité de brûlures centrale avec l'assistance des autorités gouvernementales au lieu de créer plusieurs petites unités très coûteuses. Il ne faut pas néanmoins oublier la nécessité d'avoir un centre de brûlés dans un centre hospitalo-universitaire. La valeur académique d'un tel centre justifie abondamment le coût.




 

Contact Us
mbcpa@medbc.com