 |
Egypt.
J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Vol. 24, No. 1, 2000: 47 - 54 |
Effect
of Metacarpo-Phalangeal Joint Capsulotomy on Hand Function in Post Burn Claw Hand
Deformity
M. MAGDI
SHERIF, M.D.
The Department of Plaste and Reconstructive Surgery,, Faculty, of Medicine, Ain Shams
University
ABSTRACT
This paper presents
an analysis of the effect of inetacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint capsulotomy on hand function
in patients with the post burn claw hand deformity. The study included 66 joints from 19
patients. Treatment of these cases consisted of complete dorsal scar excision, extensor
tendon tenolysis, MCP joint capsulotomy and exlensor tendon lengthening if needed. The
defect created by the excision was covered by a medium-thickness skin graft. The minimum
follow up period was 12 months. The active flexion improved from an average of -51' to 44'
with 79% of these joints achieving more than 30' of active flexion and 35% more than 60'.
Preoperatively, 41% of the joints were immobile and 89% had a range of motion (ROM) below
30%. Postoperatively, 73% had a ROM more than 30' and 23% more than 60'. Furthermore,
there was an average improvernent in ROM of the PIP joint of 17'.
INTRODUCTION
Deep dorsal hand bums
frequently result in complex deformities affecting multiple, joints [1-2]. Despite the
recent advances in the treatment of acute hand burns, secondary deformities are still
common. Among the most debilitating post burn hand deformities it the hyperextension of
the metacarpophalngeal (MCP) joints. This is often associated with interphalangeal joint
(IPJ) flexion and is frequently known as post-burn claw hand [3]. Although the incidence
of this deformity is decreasing [4] it is still by far the most common post-burn hand
deformity [1-3,5]. This deformity is usually the result of three factors:
- Skin shortening and contracture following
healing of deep dorsal hand burn.
- Improper positioning of the hand during the
healing period and
- Hand edema accumulating in the collateral
ligaments and the joint space thus increasing the proximal phalanx extension.
During the acute burn
phase the wrist is usually flexed, this is being the most comfortable position to the
patient. In this position, the extensor tendon becomes stretched, pulling the MCP joint
into extension. The collateral ligament, shortened by the accumulating edema, pulls the
proximal phalanx off the cam of the metacarpal head and accentuate the joint extension.
With time, the MPJ- collateral ligament being lax in extension becomes shortened.
Immobilization of the hand in this position results into adhesion of extensor tendons and
collateral ligaments in the shortened position. With MCP joint hyperextension, tension is
increased on the flexor tendons leading to IP joints flexion [11]. If left untreated the
hand deformity become fixed.
The usual treatment in this deformity consists of step wise release of all the restricting
structures. This may include skin release or excision, extensor tendon tenolysis with or
without lengthening, dorsal capsule release or excision (capsulotomy or capsulectomy) and
collateral ligaments release. This is followed by closure of the skin defect with skin
graft or flap according to the exposed structures. Although this technique is being
carried out in most of the burn units [1,4,6-8], the effect of this release on the hand
function has nor been studied.
This paper presents the preliminary results for the release of the post burn claw hand by
MCI` joint capsulotomy on the hand function.
Only patients with a minimum follow up of 12 months are included in this study. So, far,
66 MCP joint in 23 hands of 19 patients had adequate follow up after been treated by this
method.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
During the period from
January 1989 to December 1997, 33 hands in 28 patients with 106 post burn MCP joint
hyperextension were operated by the author in Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo,
Egypt. Out of them, one patient (4 joints) was excluded due to the presence of
cartilagenous erosion not diagnosed in the preoperative X-ray and 9 patients had a follow
up of less than 12 months. Thus, only 66 MPJ in 23 hands of 19 patients were included in
this study. They were 13 index, 13 middle, 17 ring and 23 little fingers. The thumb was
not included in this study and will be studied in a separate paper.
There was 7 males and 12 females with age of the patients at the time of the operation
ranging from 19 to 43 years (average of 24.5, SD 8. 1). The time since burn varied from 5
months to 6 years (Average: 19 months, SD 16.3). X ray to the hand was done preoperatively
and the patients were selected for surgery only if they had a good joint space.
Active flexion and extension were measured preoperatively using a finger goniometer and
the range of motion (ROM) was calculated for each joint by substracting the full extension
from flexion.
When the deformity was present bilaterally, the hand which is less used by the patient was
operated first regardless of the hand dominance or the degree of the deformity.
Operative release of structures contributing in the joint stiffness were undertaken in a
predetermined sequential order. After release of each structure, each MCP joint is tested
to determine the ROM gained by this procedure and the need for proceeding into the
following step.
After inflation of the tourniquet, all dorsal scar tissue was excised from the wrist to
the middle of the proximal phalanx and midlaterally on both sides. As much as possible,
the dorsal veins were preserved. The extensor tendons were released from the surrounding
scar both proximally towards the wrist and distally in the fingers down to the proximal
interphalangeal (PIP) joints taking care not to injure the extensor tendon insertion to
the base of the middle phalanx. The dorsal capsule and then the collateral ligaments were
released starting by the ulnar side. Release was considered adequate only when the
proximal phalanx glides easily over the metacarpal head without opening of the space
during flexion. If the movement of the proximal phalanx around the metacarpal head was
abnormal, a small curved dissector was inserted and passed gently around the volar aspect
of the metacarpal head to release the adhesion between it and the volar plate. If a snap
was felt during the last degrees of flexion or at the beginning of extension, some
remaining fibers of the collateral ligament should be found and released.
Extensor tendon lengthening was done over the metacarpal area in 5 fingers (2 index, 1
middle and 2 little fingers). The tendon was sutured either end to end or side to side
depending on the degree of lengthening required.
At the end of the release, if the extensor tendon was found to be covered by good layer of
paratenon, the defect was grafted using a medium split thickness skin graft with the MPJ
in maximal flexion. In seven cases, a reversed flow dorsal metacarpal fascial flap was
used to cover an open joint or exposed tendon devoid of paratenon. This flap was done five
times for the index using the first dorsal metacarpal fascial flap [9], in the remaining
two patients a similar flap based on the fifth dorsal metacarpal artery was used.
The tourniquet was released and meticulous haernostasis was achieved before applying the
skin graft. Special care was given to the web spaces from where bleeding is usually
profuse and graft loss was common in the early cases. An island flap derived from the
scarred skin [101 was used in the last 9 patients to reconstruct the we space
simultaneously with dorsal scar release the hand was dressed with the MCP joints in
maximum flexion without K-wire fixation. Physiotherapy was started within the first
postoperative week except in patients with extensor tendon lengthening where the hand was
fixed for 4-6 weeks.
Periodic measurement of active and passive motion were done weekly fort he first 6 weeks,
then every 2-3 weeks for 3 months and then monthly for another 3 months and every 3 months
afterwards.
The effect of the capsulotomy on the MCP joint motion as well as on the PIP joints is
studied in this paper.
RESULTS
Intraoperatively, all
the operated joints Could be flexed to 90 degrees. To obtain this, it was necessary to
release both the radial and u1nar collateral ligaments and to dissect volar plate adhesion
in all joints except on 2 ring fingers where only the u1nar collateral ligament was
released.
Graft take at the first dressing ranged from 70 to 100%. Haematoma and seroma were common
on the web spaces even after meticulous haemostasis and graft loss was therefore cornmon
in this area. In all cases treated by the reversed flow dorsal metacarpal artery fascial
flap, graft take was excellent. With the use of the web flap [101 in the last 9 patients
their was no graft loss and the syndactyly was corrected at the same time.
1. Effect of
capsulotomy on MCP joint flexion:
The preoperative active flexion ranged from 0' to I 10' (average -5 1', SD: 29) (Table
1). Only 6 of the 66 operated joints (about 9%) could reach the neutral position by active
flexion (Table 1). All other joints remained hyperextended even after maximum active
flexion. Post operatively, 79% of the released joints (52/ 66) had an active flexion angle
more than 30' and 35% (23/66) more than 60' (Table 2). The average postoperative flexion
was 44' (Range 0' to 80', SD 20), with an average gain in active flexion of 95' (range 25'
to 155' SD: 35) (Table 2). Preoperatively the average flexion in each fingers was -52 for
the index, -48 middle, -47 ring and -55 for the little finger (Table 1). The average
flexion obtained after operation in these finger was 53, 51, 45 and 34 respectively (Table
2). Postoperative flexion was more than 30' in 92% of the operated index and middle
fingers, 88% of the ring fingers and 56% of the little fingers (Table 2).
2. Effect of
capsulotomy on MCP joint extension:
Preoperatively, the MCP joint extension ranged from +10' to 110' with an average of
+61' (SD 24) (Table 3). The postoperative extension ranged between +35' and -35' with an
average of -0.2 ± 14 (Table 4). In 45 of the operated joints (69%), the MCP can reach
normal active extension (between 0' and +20') after the operation (Table 4). In only six
joints (9%) the postoperative MCP joint extension was more than +20', while in 15 (23%)
there was an extension lag ranging from 5' to 35' (Average 17, SD 12).
Extension lag was common in the first part of the study where the capsulotomy was done
through an incision in the extensor tendon and where a graft loss at the web space was
common. These joints were kept in flexion for 5 to 7 days before starting joint movement.
Furthermore, healing by secondary intention was followed delayed physiotherapy with
limitation of finger movements.
Postoperatively, the average MCP extension in all fingers ranged from A I to +5 with
extension lag in the index and middle fingers and slight hyperextension in the ring and
little fingers (Table 5).
3- Range of motion
(ROM):
Preoperatively, the average ROM was 10' (Range: 0' to 40', SD: 11) (Table 5). In 27 of
the 66 operated joints (41%) the joints were completely immobile and the ROM was less than
30' in 89% of these joints (Table 5). Furthermore, the range of movement of these joints
was always in the hyperextension zone.
The average postoperative ROM was 44' (range 5' to 75', SD: 19) (Table 6). Eighteen of the
66 (27%) had a postoperative ROM below 30' while 15 (23%) had a ROM above 60' after the
operation (Table 6). In all the operated joints, the passive ROM was always greater than
the active ROM, especially in the early postoperative period. With time, the gap between
the passive and active ROM decreased.
Although preoperatively the ROM was almost similar in all fingers (10,9,10,10) (Table 5),
the worst postoperative ROM was noticed in the little finger (Table 6).
4- The effect on PIP
joint:
The effect on the PIP joint was recorded in only 32 joints of 10 patients (6 index, 6
middle, 9 ring and 11 little fingers). The average preoperative ROM was 11 (SD: 17) while
the average postoperative ROM was 28' (SD: 24) with an average improvement of 17' (Table
7). The best post operative ROM was seen in the middle finger while best improvement was
seen in the ring finger. The little finger PIP joint shows the worst preoperative and
postoperative ROM in this series (Tables 7&8). Preoperatively, 12 joints were
completely immobile, in 8 the ROM was below 5' while only one joint had 75' of motion
(Table 8). Postoperatively only 5 joints had no active motion, 14 had a ROM below 30' in 8
the ROM ranged from 30' to 50' while 5 joints had a ROM above 50'. In the 12 PIP joint
without any active preoperative motion 5 had no improvement, while 6 could obtain 30' of
active ROM an more than 20' in only one joint (Table 8).
5- Effect onfinger
deviation andjoint stability:
Ulnar deviation of the finger was present in 8 fingers preoperatively: I index I
middle 3 ring and 3 little fingers. The deviation ranged from 20' to 45'. Post operative 2
fingers were completely correlated (index and middle) while the other were only partially
corrected with better correction in the ring than little fingers.
Preop. flex |
0° |
From 0° to -30° |
From -30° to -60° |
More than -60° |
Overall |
Index (13) |
1 (8%) |
2 (15%) |
4 (31%) |
6 (46%) |
-52° |
Middle (13) |
1 (8%) |
2 (15%) |
5 (38.5%) |
5 (38.5%) |
-48° |
Ring (17) |
2 (12%) |
3 (18%) |
7 (41%) |
5 (29%) |
-47° |
Little (23) |
2 (9%) |
1 (4%) |
10 (43.5%) |
10 (43.5%) |
-55° |
Total (66) |
6(9%) |
8 (12%) |
26 (39%) |
26 (39%) |
-51° |
|
Table (1): Preoperative flexion
in the operated joints. |
Preop. flex |
From 0° to -30° |
From -30° to -60° |
More than -60° |
Overall |
Index (13) |
1 (8%) |
4 (31%) |
8 (62%) |
53° |
Middle (13) |
1 (8%) |
6 (46%) |
6 (46%) |
51° |
Ring (17) |
2 (12%) |
1 (59%) |
5 (29%) |
45° |
Little (23) |
2 (43.5%) |
9 (39%) |
4 (17.5%) |
34° |
Total (66) |
14(21%) |
29 (44%) |
23 (35%) |
44° |
|
Table (2): Postoperative flexions
after MCP joints capsulotomy by fingers |
Preop. flex |
From 0° to -30° |
From -30° to -60° |
More than -60° |
Overall |
Index (13) |
1 (8%) |
3 (23%) |
9 (69%) |
62° |
Middle (13) |
1 (8%) |
3 (23%) |
9 (69%) |
+57° |
Ring (17) |
3 (18%) |
4 (24%) |
10 (58%) |
+57° |
Little (23) |
3 (13%) |
3 (13%) |
17 (74%) |
+64° |
Total (66) |
8(12%) |
13 (20%) |
45 (68%) |
+61° |
|
Table (3): Preoperative extension
by fingers |
Postop. ext |
0° |
From 0° to -35° |
From 0° to +20° |
More than +20° |
Overall ext. |
Index (13) |
6 (46%) |
6 (46%) |
1 (8%) |
|
-11° |
Middle (13) |
5 (38%) |
4 (31%) |
3 (23%) |
1 (8%) |
-3° |
Ring (17) |
3 (17.5%) |
9 (53%) |
2 (12%) |
3 (17.5%) |
+3° |
Little (23) |
1 (5%) |
12 (52%) |
8 (34%) |
2 (9%) |
+5° |
Total (66) |
5 (22.5%) |
31 (47%) |
14 (21%) |
6 (9%) |
-0.22° |
|
Table (4): Postoperative
extension after MCP joints capsulotomy. |
Preop. ROM |
0° |
From 0° to -30° |
More than 30° |
Overall ROM |
Index (13) |
6 (46%) |
6 (46%) |
1 (8%) |
10° |
Middle (13) |
6 (46%) |
6 (46%) |
1 (8%) |
9° |
Ring (17) |
8 (47%) |
7 (41%) |
2 (12%) |
10° |
Little (23) |
7 (30%) |
13 (57%) |
3 (13%) |
10° |
Total (66) |
27 (41%) |
32 (48%) |
7 (11%) |
10° |
|
Table (5):Preoperative ROM |
Postop. ROM |
From 0° to 30° |
From 30° to 60° |
More than 60° |
Overall ROM |
Index (13) |
3 (23%) |
6 (46%) |
4 (31%) |
42° |
Middle (13) |
2 (15.5%) |
9 (69%) |
2 (15.5%) |
48° |
Ring (17) |
3 (17.5%) |
10 (59%) |
4 (23.5%) |
48° |
Little (23) |
10 (43.5%) |
10 (59%) |
4 (17.5%) |
39° |
Total (66) |
18 (27%) |
9 (39%) |
14 (21%) |
44° |
|
Table (6):Postoperative ROM. |
PIP joint ROM |
Preoperative |
Postoperative |
Improvement |
Index |
14° |
26 |
12° |
Middle |
28° |
35° |
7° |
Ring |
8° |
31° |
23° |
Little |
5° |
17 |
12° |
Total |
11° |
28° |
17° |
|
Table (7):PIP joint ROM before
and after MCP capsulotomy |
|
No movement |
Below 30° |
Below 50° |
Above 50° |
No movement (12) |
5 |
6 |
1 |
|
Below 10 (10) |
|
8 |
2 |
|
Below 30 (5) |
|
|
5 |
|
Above 30 (5) |
|
|
1 |
4 |
Total 32 |
5 |
14 |
9 |
4 |
|
Table (8): Relation between pre-
and post-operative PIP joint ROM after MCP capsulotomy |
|
DISCUSSION
Because of early
excision and grafting of hand bums as well as better splinting techniques, the incidence
of the classical post burn hand claw hand is decreasing [4]. However, this deformity is
especially still common in the developing countries. This may be related to the lack of
burn service and good physiotherapy. Furthermore, most of these patients with deep hand
burns do not present to plastic surgeon except with late and fixed deformities [11].
During the last few years, only 19 of the patients operated upon for the treatment of
postburn MCP joint hyperextension could be followed up for more than 12 months. The result
of MCP capsulotomy on 66 joints on the hand function in these patients is analyzed.
I - The
effect of capsulotomy on MCP joint flexion:
Flexion obtained in this study was more than 30' in 79% of the joints and more than
60' in 35%. Buch 112] reports an improvement in 75% of the operated hands. In his study,
he noticed that the worst results were associated with cases requiring skin grafts. Skin
grafting was necessary in all patients of the present group. However, the results from the
two studies cannot be compared as he reports results by hands not by joints as well as due
to the heterogenousity of his group including joints stiff in flexion and extension and
due to different aetiology. Sinnlar poor result could be noticed in the little finger both
in this study as well as in other previous studies [11,12].
II - The effect of MCP
joint capsulotomy on extension:
Comparing pre and post operative extension in the operated joints shows a considerable
decrease in the degree of extension from an average preoperative extension of +61' (range:
+10' to +I 10') to an average post operative extension of -0.2 (range: -35' to +35').
Postoperatively, 45/66 (68%) of the operated joints could reach the normal extension (0'
to +20'). In about 23% of the operated joints (15/66) there was an extensor lag ranging
from 5' to 35' degrees (average 17.5). Extension lags were commonly seen after
1-capsulotomy done through the extensor tendon (15/15 or 100%) where flexion was
maintained for 5 to 7 days before starting physiotherapy to avoid tendon rupture at the
suture line. 2- cases associated with skin graft loss (9/15 or 60%), graft loss was usual
at the web space where haematoma is common. Graft loss usually results into a delay in the
start of physiotherapy until complete healing 3Extensor tendon lengthening (in 3/15 or
20%), extension lag in these cases can be attributed to excessive lengthening of the
tendon creating an imbalance in the extensor cascade or to prolonged fixed position of the
MCP in moderate flexion (30'-45') until tendon healing before starting active and passive
exercise. Although Simpson and Flaherty in [141 suggested gradual elongation of the
extensor tendon and the overlying skin by placing an expander deep to the tendon, the need
for extensor tendon lengthening in this series cannot be determined preoperatively due to
the limited mobility of MCP joints irrespective of wrist position. Tendon lengthening
could only be determined intraoperatively, when the release of all structures did not give
the desired 90 degrees of flexion in the joint.
III- The effect of
capsulotomy on ROM of the MCP joint:
Preoperatively, about 89% of the joints released had less than 30' of motion with
about 41 % were completely immobile. Postoperatively, only 27% of the released joints had
a active ROM below 30' while about 23% had an active ROM greater than 60' which can be
considered as a functionally excellent result Buch [12] reports an increase in ROM was up
to 30' in 70% of the treated MPJ while Week et al. [151, have a ROM greater than 30' in
66% of the released joints this is contrast with the 77% of the joints in this series
having a ROM in above 30'. The average improvement in active ROM in this series was 32',
this is much better than the results presented by Gould and Nicholson [16], where the mean
gain in active motion was 13'. The difference in the result can be attributed to the early
physiotherapy in our group of patients or due to some difference in the pathology of joint
contracture in the burn and traumatic cases.
As noticed by Week et al. [15] the passive ROM is always better than the active ROM. This
is especially seen in the early postoperative period, the gap between the 2 measurements
seems to decrease with time suggesting a better result can be expected with more and
earlier muscle strengthening exercise.
IV- The effect of
capsulotomy on the PIP J . oint ROM:
The overall hand function improved more than the effect of the capsulotomy in the MCP
joint. The average post operative ROM was 28 with an average improvement of 17' (range
075) after MCP capsulotomy. This may be due to the effect of continuous splinting of the
fingers in extension or to the increased tension on the extensor tendon after the
correction of the MCP hyperextension. The PIP joint is allowed to have a better extension
by the long extensors and the intrinsic muscles [17]. The moderate increase in he PIP
joint ROM after correction claw hand deformity significantly improve the hand function of
the patient. Classically, patients with post burn claw hand not only needs release of the
MCP joints, A second stage is usually needed for release of the flexed PIP joints and for
reconstruction of the extensor tendon over the PIP joint. Simultaneous release of the
contracture at MCP and PIP joints can maximize the functional result, however, with
difficult physiotherapy at both joints levels.
Conclusion:
Although the results of post-bum hand reconstruction is not usually gratifying, in
this study 79% of the released joints could have an active flexion more than 30' and about
35% can reach a flexion angle more than 60'. The average increase in the ROM was about 33'
with 73% of joints having a ROM above 30' and above 60' in about 23%. Furthermore, the MCP
capsulotomy did not only improve the ROM of the joints but also restored a useful
functional position to he fingers. It has also improved the PIP joint ROM by an average of
17'. Although this can be considered as a limited improvement, it greatly affects the
overall hand function. Simultaneous release of the MCP and PIP joints will decrease the
number of operation needed to reconstruct the post bum claw hand.
REFERENCE
- Ionesco A., Raduleseu V. and Aburel V.:
Post bum sequelae on the dorsal aspect of the hand. Injuries to the extensor apparatus of
the fingers. Br. J. Plast. Surg., 21: 347, 1967.
- Sherif M.M. and Boswick LA.: Deformities of
the small joints of he hands following burn injury. Bulletin and clinical review of burn
inuries, 11 (4): 15-18, 1985.
- Me Cormack R.: Stiffness of the inured
hand: Analysis, prevention and treatment, 581-591, 1964.
- Huang T.T., Larson D.L. & Lewis S.R.:
Burned hands: Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 56: 21-28, 1975.
- Beasley RX: Secondary repair of burned hands. Clin. Plast. Surg., 8: 141-162, 1981.
- Goldner J.L.: Reconstructive surgery of the hand following thermal injuries. Clin.
Orthop., 13, 98, 1959.
- Salisbury R.E. and Dingeldein G.P.: The burned hand and upper extremity. In Green (Ed)
operative hand surgery New York: ChurchillLivingstone, pp. 1523-51, 1982.
- Gorenevelt, Schoorl R. and Hermans R.P.: Retrospective study of reconstructive surgery
of the burned hand. Burns, 11, 351, 1985.
- Sherif M.M.: First dorsal metacarpal artery flap in hand reconstruction 11 clinical
application. J. Hand Surg., 19X 32-38, 1994.
- Sherif M.M. and Shaker A.A.: A new technique for reconstruction of sever post burn
syndactyly. Egypt. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 21: 179-184, 1997.
- Donelan M.B.: Reconstructive surgery of the post burn hand and upper extremity. In
Plastic Surgery pp. 5452-81, McCarthy (Ed.) W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1990.
- Buch V.: Clinical and functional assessment of the hand after metacarpophalangeal
capsulotomy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 53, 452, 1974.
- Rouge D., Gavroy j.L., Thaury N. and Costagliola M.: Evaluation et reparation des
sequelles de brulure du 5 eme rayon de la main Annals of the MBC 5, 224-228, 1992.
- Simpson R.L. and Flaherty M.E.: The burned small finger. Clin. Plast. Surg., 19:
673-682, 1992.
- Weeks P.M., Young V.L. and Wray R.C.: Operative mobilization of stiff
metacarpophalangeal joints: Dorsal versus volar apporach. Ann. Plast. Surg., 5: 178-185,
1980.
- Gould J.S. and Nicholson B.: Capsulectomy of the metacarpophalagneal and proximal
interphalangeal joints of the hand. J. Hand Surg., 4, 482, 1979.
- Mulder J.0. and Landesmeer J.M.F.: The mechanism of claw hand J. Bone Joint Surg., 50
(B), 664, 1968.
|